[arcmedia] W3C TAG discussion of web packaging
Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> Fri, 16 January 2015 09:18 UTC
Return-Path: <gk@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878C91AC3FF for <arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 01:18:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DYaFndy0B8yL for <arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 01:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay13.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay13.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.166]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8A11AC3E4 for <arcmedia@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 01:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.207]) by relay13.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1YC338-0003Kf-hn for arcmedia@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:18:38 +0000
Received: from gklyne.plus.com ([80.229.154.156] helo=cheery.atuin.ninebynine.org) by smtp4.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1YC338-0005o3-EJ for arcmedia@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:18:38 +0000
Message-ID: <54B8D76D.8040501@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:18:37 +0000
From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "arcmedia@ietf.org" <arcmedia@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/arcmedia/PUZ48HgT-hTXx6vfMq04u6xoUWI>
Subject: [arcmedia] W3C TAG discussion of web packaging
X-BeenThere: arcmedia@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of creating a new top-level media type, \"archive\", for archive bundles." <arcmedia.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arcmedia/>
List-Post: <mailto:arcmedia@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:18:43 -0000
All,
Two maybe-relevant activities from W3C TAG w.r.t. packaging on the web:
1. Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of
the "Packaging on the Web" specification:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2015Jan/0074.html
2. Discussion of using manifests as an alternative to packaging:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2015Jan/0075.html
Question: should manifest (by reference) packages be considered in scope for
arcmedia? I don't currently have a strong view, just asking.
#g
--
- [arcmedia] W3C TAG discussion of web packaging Graham Klyne