Re: [arcmedia] data tracker issue?

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 22 May 2015 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB871A035F for <arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aTTWI7FvxkTU for <arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD35B1A0358 for <arcmedia@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so38570429igb.1 for <arcmedia@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LxPIDwMNSFeyQnAu7uso1ehVdl6MVt51swfU9Bbom38=; b=KyAQsAIcqUoLF7WvL8k2Jq4mPwTFVb7zmiYa0ZQgtaGBnhkNjMfXS9j7Gd+5ecTJgf IHP/IV0kCem6RnvPQD6ITY6QhQl6tWCxYt1Q5PqbHBCwue7Q/zG07rgTSVaPt+jYg0oC OEYkB8jYNGbeKwjTa5IyfREtYwZZqN2jcJfO9QwqaUrVINXlP1Xlsp2znm0uMW0F83/7 /ZqxPlDz0mKk9HkS0ZQOsXSO6DtjqHOAdoATKMAx16r3jB2cydaZXzcrsJqfV93zkWgJ pMDs64LWFl3G9CYmrE8J47spyaiGzKmMubGNxe6abdZ7ABZy9BLHjUXLJnT1e9OaR5/s RQ3w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.12.34 with SMTP id w34mr7912309ioi.10.1432309100362; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.156.1 with HTTP; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACweHNAr9FpMyxDvUfDSNX8Lf56d-qEATNjPqVFcGEeNhkj6bw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACweHNAr9FpMyxDvUfDSNX8Lf56d-qEATNjPqVFcGEeNhkj6bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 11:38:20 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: OLT4VPiXu6yukWpNkC2yCYdzJNk
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVCKudP7MvitQPO3=rCz65pQT+TRfFyyvgyLjivhrfuOBg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/arcmedia/WMrDHRs_EFkoK6qLxIyEWiVBgZs>
Cc: "arcmedia@ietf.org" <arcmedia@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [arcmedia] data tracker issue?
X-BeenThere: arcmedia@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of creating a new top-level media type, \"archive\", for archive bundles." <arcmedia.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arcmedia/>
List-Post: <mailto:arcmedia@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:38:22 -0000

As no one's responded yet:

It always helps to use full draft names, so we're sure what you're
talking about.  I presume you're referring to these:

draft-seantek-kerwin-arcmedia-type
draft-arcmedia-type

The issue here is that the second name does not fit in with the naming
conventions we use (which is that working group documents are called
"draft-ietf-WGNAME-xx-yy", and individual drafts are called
"draft-AUTHORNAME-xx-yy" -- with the further convention that if the
first token after "AUTHORNAME" matches a working group name, the draft
is considered "related to" that working group).

So "draft-arcmedia-type" should never have been posted, and shouldn't
be updated, and draft-seantek-kerwin-arcmedia-type is the one to go
with.  Unfortunately, by listing the two authors separately in the
name, you'll lose the advantage of having the tools associate that
draft with this working group as "related".  (A name such as
draft-seantekkerwin-arcmedia-type (without the dash between the names)
would have worked better, but never mind.)

The next step is to get a working-group version that Dave can approve,
which will be called "draft-ietf-arcmedia-type", submit that with
Dave's approval, and mark it as replacing
draft-seantek-kerwin-arcmedia-type.

The draft naming stuff can be a bit odd to newcomers to the IETF, but
whatever happens usually isn't a big deal.

Barry

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>; wrote:
> Hi again folks,
>
> Something felt a bit weird while I was rebuilding and submitting the -01
> draft, and it's just occurred to me what it was.
>
> On Oct 27 last year two almost identical -00 versions were submitted, at
> about the same time, named -seantek-kerwin- and -arcmedia-. Presumably the
> latter is the one we want, but according to tools.ietf.org the
> individually-named version supersedes the WG-named.
>
> Is this an issue?
>
> Cheers
> --
>   Matthew Kerwin
>   http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
>
> _______________________________________________
> arcmedia mailing list
> arcmedia@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia
>