Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 01 January 2015 00:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9F01A1AF2; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:59:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZK7BALsOKFIG; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B8F1A1AA8; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.131] (unknown [71.179.211.185]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4E8922E260; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 19:59:44 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0201MB09606618607D909EA82635E0C35C0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 19:59:43 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <86C96FDF-9A48-43A3-B38A-468F4407AD82@mnot.net>
References: <CAL0qLwYdnW+o4WUb72VM6yuEP8-jBxQ-KgYQm7KP2Sq9E6dp5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPRnXtkg5GzLmPOWP=DrV8gTvgV+XDhOi=n3OZ86Yrhw+hOgJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwad-UcKECA=m7Zqhw+VZ6wy=bFPVKs_ik+fqjPW7-U7cQ@mail.gmail.com> <54A41D6C.9010501@ninebynine.org> <DM2PR0201MB09606618607D909EA82635E0C35C0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/arcmedia/Z-Q0L44F9Hk5kDtFbONUmTi3XLk
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 20:23:07 -0800
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "arcmedia@ietf.org" <arcmedia@ietf.org>, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Public TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia
X-BeenThere: arcmedia@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of creating a new top-level media type, \"archive\", for archive bundles." <arcmedia.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arcmedia/>
List-Post: <mailto:arcmedia@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:59:50 -0000
… which isn’t yet final, BTW. Cheers, > On 31 Dec 2014, at 7:00 pm, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote: > > I think the arcmedia WG charter should take into the W3C TAG work on packaging/archives > > http://w3ctag.github.io/packaging-on-the-web/ > > (W3c-tag bcc) > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: apps-discuss [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Graham Klyne >> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 8:00 AM >> To: Murray S. Kucherawy; Stian Soiland-Reyes >> Cc: arcmedia@ietf.org; IETF Apps Discuss >> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia >> >> Re: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arcmedia/current/msg00001.html >> >> I think the suggested charter looks pretty good. The work seems well-scoped to >> me. >> >> I'd expect to review at least the proposed base document, and maybe some of >> the initial registrations. >> >> #g >> -- >> >> >> On 30/12/2014 18:13, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes < >>> soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi - what's the status of the chartering of the arcmedia WG? I don't >>>> see that it has been added to http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ and >>>> there is no further emails on the arcmedia mailing list. >>>> >>> >>> A mailing list was created shortly after the November meeting, and the >>> proposed charter was posted there and here. There has been no >>> response of any kind. >>> >>> -MSK >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> apps-discuss mailing list >>> apps-discuss@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> apps-discuss mailing list >> apps-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > apps-discuss mailing list > apps-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- [arcmedia] Fwd: Proposed charter for arcmedia Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Stian Soiland-Reyes
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Stian Soiland-Reyes
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Graham Klyne
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Dave Crocker
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Larry Masinter
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Dave Crocker
- Re: [arcmedia] FW: [apps-discuss] Proposed charte… Graham Klyne
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Graham Klyne
- Re: [arcmedia] FW: [apps-discuss] Proposed charte… Stian Soiland-Reyes
- Re: [arcmedia] FW: [apps-discuss] Proposed charte… Graham Klyne
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Sean Leonard
- Re: [arcmedia] FW: [apps-discuss] Proposed charte… Sean Leonard
- Re: [arcmedia] FW: [apps-discuss] Proposed charte… Graham Klyne
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Larry Masinter
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Sean Leonard
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Sean Leonard
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Sean Leonard
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Sean Leonard
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter fo… Larry Masinter