Re: [arcmedia] data tracker issue?

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 22 May 2015 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2D71A1B6D for <arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w-s7GCwDhyo1 for <arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 988861A1BE0 for <arcmedia@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by padbw4 with SMTP id bw4so22986180pad.0 for <arcmedia@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AbJaOrwdE29qwkqug9XsnHaxcaHcKwtNsafAH9i+e7s=; b=Ow0AlzSlYshDz1+AlcDniBOvFWdwnijs+ETs+5SFBl7MspdgTa2tHPEoNQXgllCstA XK+6z82aBmOjakjvYDL1ffAGiXOocvTh8gJrZaw0yczVXbaBa4/UPlWBTZebGNqAzONR mPWUxyBd5ZRYBIT77hcNrC1Y9X8n3Z2+q9QuOxylfXcZgLZdw6sQ6XbmSD5asEqG4sE6 4jHus6LaTErzKWz/o5+9c0bxIqaZ0nDuGy0A4Ls1HnCpXrY2d6h2f12nR5acWYHUhd4A Lyv3gDDgehZHsVbYv0orleNsu4Qzmi1TnXQzU6Q/DOt+kzeBq/Bgk+D9hgGCXFAkyY9V dMEA==
X-Received: by 10.70.33.67 with SMTP id p3mr16811950pdi.126.1432310244335; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2602:304:cda0:ace0:292d:5521:f9eb:c1e4? ([2602:304:cda0:ace0:292d:5521:f9eb:c1e4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j10sm2530915pdk.48.2015.05.22.08.57.23 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 May 2015 08:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <555F51E1.9060404@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 08:57:21 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
References: <CACweHNAr9FpMyxDvUfDSNX8Lf56d-qEATNjPqVFcGEeNhkj6bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCKudP7MvitQPO3=rCz65pQT+TRfFyyvgyLjivhrfuOBg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCKudP7MvitQPO3=rCz65pQT+TRfFyyvgyLjivhrfuOBg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/arcmedia/b2hIdmrl0z5Em331OoKWebtn9yk>
Cc: "arcmedia@ietf.org" <arcmedia@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [arcmedia] data tracker issue?
X-BeenThere: arcmedia@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of creating a new top-level media type, \"archive\", for archive bundles." <arcmedia.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arcmedia/>
List-Post: <mailto:arcmedia@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:57:26 -0000

On 5/22/2015 8:38 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> The next step is to get a working-group version that Dave can approve,
> which will be called "draft-ietf-arcmedia-type", submit that with
> Dave's approval, and mark it as replacing
> draft-seantek-kerwin-arcmedia-type.


Sorry for not responding sooner.

The above is the essential point:

     As of now, the wg has no draft.

     The revised 'personal' draft needs to be REVIEWED BY THE WORKING
GROUP and approved for adoption by the wg.  The chair (me) does the
mechanics of approving the document into the working group's online
space for documents, but it's based on working group rough consensus.

So that everyone is clear:  IETF working group "Adoption" is not an
approval of the content of the draft, but rather agreement to use the
document as a base for the work of the group.

To emphasize:

     We need to see enough comments posted about the draft to determine
that there is real breadth and depth of interest in it.

     That is, we need to see activity that shows there is some real
range of different people active in the topic and that that range has
rough consensus to adopt the document.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net