Re: [arcmedia] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-seantek-kerwin-arcmedia-type-01.txt

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Tue, 23 June 2015 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <phluid61@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907FE1A1A2D for <arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id axBMZSPLglvI for <arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68151A1A24 for <arcmedia@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiax193 with SMTP id x193so16475430oia.2 for <arcmedia@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=s8NBK+DeZmrwx3DobBj+L0/CULKY17KnRUAzTgs3K4A=; b=eIReGRl4igbVBMwgunoYte1o0984YqTJN0OyJFqB2gEpB3ZF+l08HAGRvzx/D3XoUa baAATZBuB/hE2DtIMVn3mFnaGAwyeBUN+3ouEdAxi+h4uKEocZcbIURygw9lcxOwN+AC pnakLy0Z2paWklk+np0RqqIq0gpZP1PSvAIMQi7Xo8vSQy7gutr643/6qxhnJqLWh4bf lcbE7KZdfgHjroByfYyhix8OJH2Q2TzQ4QTUHQeLjm2yEIc6Vkh8r89fZW7v+zx9de0i TdYCaSQiMNAnTkLOP/kMAy9H0oJwpGELS0w6yUJ5diTPczKcEgfu8XnKkyYLDwuNHkXK 45+Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.48.231 with SMTP id p7mr31697129obn.19.1435093771405; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.202.226.205 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.226.205 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55898376.4040100@gmail.com>
References: <20150505222940.24931.42809.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACweHNDFgcqVDm1GqEkf1pCDCTAWgVEcgF8ioifYUMLSOT=PHQ@mail.gmail.com> <557B5800.6030106@gmail.com> <CAPRnXtk85x_LVnk0OAf7f5GiZiOCxSgKNJGGWs4MGdwCdR0MxA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPRnXt==qOcWXJ+Zf5qOo0JBBBUriG-Q+xxOi_0skuzZd+EgXw@mail.gmail.com> <55898376.4040100@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 07:09:31 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QIAlbi0JI9FgG-vbW2cni6r0KZk
Message-ID: <CACweHNCtaGfWp4_dMcZJZ7dGq68QQ+X94_J5RamSeWq21CiKKw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
To: Heather Flanagan <hlflanagan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b67440076d0fd051935cedd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/arcmedia/bwoQmIsnNlXSdgG_YOFNZJiztso>
Cc: arcmedia@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [arcmedia] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-seantek-kerwin-arcmedia-type-01.txt
X-BeenThere: arcmedia@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of creating a new top-level media type, \"archive\", for archive bundles." <arcmedia.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/arcmedia/>
List-Post: <mailto:arcmedia@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 21:09:33 -0000

On 24/06/2015 2:04 AM, "Heather Flanagan" <hlflanagan@gmail.com>; wrote:
>
> I know we're not directing client behavior here, but I wonder if it's
> worth mentioning the use case of offline use of these archives? Or is
> that too client-y?
>

I think that depends on what we'd actually write. We haven't explicitly
said anything about online use, as it is. What sort of thing did you have
in mind?

>
> I'm going to ping the folks over in the DPUB group at the W3C to see
> if they have any useful feedback.
>
>
> - -Heather
>