IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 02 January 2015 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229571A0163; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 09:59:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FTGBsBArIl6O; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 09:59:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E1D41A1BCB; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 09:59:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so4798347wes.15; Fri, 02 Jan 2015 09:59:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=T3MsuISsPAdMeIBKdmyefmYq2zgOnHSzJpvaIAX+w2Y=; b=YNfnPTV432U0/qgpsR+PoAMoUQ0JpexPsX2X/2p9aIzW9EgFpDDeLHM11vgqsnnJ3u qBkuYtWarlRnO19Gf1pFaMPfW/bDQeDzo0toUWWC97Axp5zJrtxn/kqtRiCVkGytPXn3 FSmVq61JcoeOSXfEN84+AaiascOWWnoXnSrczzMVAAIIwt0Ze/+cV4l9CCE22mXMOCRA gRAl2OJtJm5Z7+Y/26SUOER2xXxskAw8oQs+IZ7RMnt2zX5PEBuFz/sqUX/Q1nhG0ESH PWq1JvYfSJGsW6a17da1KodmBem3KSsWwrWl9xpSobzcKeav45+YkOKatXcpPsE0G1Hg 3p7w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.218.39 with SMTP id pd7mr137419814wic.21.1420221594374; Fri, 02 Jan 2015 09:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.204.198 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 09:59:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54A69D2D.3010309@seantek.com>
References: <CAL0qLwYdnW+o4WUb72VM6yuEP8-jBxQ-KgYQm7KP2Sq9E6dp5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPRnXtkg5GzLmPOWP=DrV8gTvgV+XDhOi=n3OZ86Yrhw+hOgJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwad-UcKECA=m7Zqhw+VZ6wy=bFPVKs_ik+fqjPW7-U7cQ@mail.gmail.com> <54A41D6C.9010501@ninebynine.org> <54A45FBD.1070701@dcrocker.net> <54A69D2D.3010309@seantek.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 09:59:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa60X9vaGYo4EuDmbpnPonzpP2n1TcyaA182O=i9ZEN-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134cd58a2992e050baf1b8e"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/arcmedia/cb_ZhDarkZEczef4GRWE8I8vu9I
Cc: "arcmedia@ietf.org" <arcmedia@ietf.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia
X-BeenThere: arcmedia@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of creating a new top-level media type, \"archive\", for archive bundles." <arcmedia.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arcmedia/>
List-Post: <mailto:arcmedia@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 17:59:58 -0000

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> wrote:

> Hello all and Happy New Year. Sorry that I didn't respond to this thread
> earlier--a lot going on with the holidays.
>
> I looked at <https://github.com/mskucherawy/docs/blob/master/
> charter-arcmedia> just now, which I assume is the latest.
>
> On 12/31/2014 12:42 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>> its initial input.  It will specify rules for registering subtypes
>>> under that new top-level type.  All of the usual things will be
>>> considered, including type suffixes, fragment identifiers, and
>>> internationalization.
>>>
>> Replace sentence with:
>>
>>      The rules will at least include consideration of type suffixes,
>> fragment identifiers, and internationalization.
>>
>
> Yes, please include this text. (It's not in yet.)
>

It was supposed to be but it got truncated.  Added now.

The statement "No other work is in scope for this working group" is not
> necessary IMO. If it is not in the approved charter, is is out-of-scope by
> definition.
>

That has not been the case in the past; sometimes leaving it unstated has
been interpreted as an ambiguity, and we're left to argue about whether
unstated things are covered by other wording.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email