IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [armd] FW: armd - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 83

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Tue, 24 January 2012 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA54721F84E2 for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:13:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.231, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cuv561GNAV+O for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:13:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1788E21F84DF for <armd@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:13:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id ACP57622; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:13:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from DFWEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:11:45 -0800
Received: from DFWEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.100]) by dfweml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.151]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:11:42 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "armd@ietf.org" <armd@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [armd] FW: armd - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 83
Thread-Index: AczawQD8pew3ILm3QACvOh6fsnS0/QAATvdgAAAVPjA=
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:11:41 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F632E16E22@dfweml505-mbx>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76429542D@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76429542D@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.97]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [armd] FW: armd - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 83
X-BeenThere: armd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <armd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd>
List-Post: <mailto:armd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:13:58 -0000

Ron, 

There is new draft on ARP/ND scaling BCP to be discussed at the meeting. 
We definitely want to close the armd-problem-statement draft. In addition, we need to decide if  draft-karir-ARMD-statistics-00 needs to be dropped or published as an informational draft. 

Granted that the statistics draft is not perfect, but it is the only one statistics on ARP/ND which concluded that the real problem of ARP/ND is at L2/L3 boundary router instead of bandwidth consumed or end stations processing too many broadcast messages.   So it has some value.  

Linda 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: armd-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:armd-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Ronald Bonica
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:02 PM
> To: armd@ietf.org
> Subject: [armd] FW: armd - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 83
> 
> Do we have a idea what the agenda will look like?
> 
>                               Ron
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
> > [mailto:session_request_developers@ietf.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:53 PM
> > To: session-request@ietf.org
> > Cc: dromasca@avaya.com; Ronald Bonica; bschlies@cisco.com;
> > ldunbar@huawei.com
> > Subject: armd - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 83
> >
> > A new meeting session request has just been submitted
> > by Benson Schliesser, a working group chair of armd.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > Working Group Name: armd
> > Area Name: Operations and Management Area
> > Session Requester: Benson Schliesser
> >
> > Number of Sessions: 1
> > Length of Session(s):  1 hour
> >
> >
> > Number of Attendees: 125
> > Conflicts to Avoid:
> >   First Priority:  intarea l2vpn opsarea opsawg trill rtgarea rtgwg
> > iesg iab idr l3vpn
> >   Second Priority: storm mpls mif lisp grow netconf netmod opsec pce
> > sidr
> >   Third Priority: behave tsvarea sidr idr v6ops eman 6renum cdni
> forces
> > pcp
> >   BOF or IRTF Session: rrg cloud dcops sdnp sdn
> >
> > Special Requests:
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> armd mailing list
> armd@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email