Re: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-03.txt [corrected one]

Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> Thu, 28 June 2012 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ghanwani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C7C11E80AE for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.939
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.939 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gw9zAj+jMMrG for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C867E11E8088 for <armd@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcqp1 with SMTP id p1so2092054vcq.31 for <armd@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8fXS5vIZIQsjAMjrQtoW06tLnF87Bb/QtDfMNVxNdzE=; b=IS4Pbaq30sgIrMZ0zuQvfLTPUxBuevQE6UU/ulIA3bptfAFjpzFGXxUZz2aiRvPA9W ouQg916HtzJlGXWs6R+fGLf/hOPU7hP42jGyF5qe16Lj5NU0AboUfLFEVhhGNu3GKpk+ b/NJgFFO9m0gdiXWJDZzaDrWjlXpz0bZN4AxK76fZ5HomwVxLLAPxKLxrWSmwylmDaVC 0PVeSEkTx9OWykgRitltwhw98IFZkR/YultokWB2ox8Vjmkh27ShRVHNJ/1xqbSw57cJ 9dXXmAfspJntJ4BJd95ubRJnvKZ0N13YqpEQSGkkWmH2oN/dXOpX8Oa1ACL7hNLwEhNN rD3A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.30.2 with SMTP id o2mr2383984vdh.132.1340924757947; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: ghanwani@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.67.228 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F6339500C9@dfweml505-mbx>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F6339500C9@dfweml505-mbx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:05:57 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: NqtalHZGLSl47dfY3r5lkOJxfFg
Message-ID: <CA+-tSzy4gk7WvE4Oyz3mf0CE0Fon-BXCdDo-gcFSu=P=QO9U7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>, "armd@ietf.org" <armd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-03.txt [corrected one]
X-BeenThere: armd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <armd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd>
List-Post: <mailto:armd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:06:04 -0000

I'm OK with all of this document except that Section 6.4.4
does not capture the fact that simply using overlays  _does not_
address the ARP problem in an of itself.  In other words, if I'm
using overlays and the VMs are located in different ToR switches
in the data center, then ARPs (even though encapsulated) would
still need to traverse the core.

Anoop

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>; wrote:
> Dear ARMD Participants -
>
>
>
> This message begins a two week WG Last Call for
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement/, ending
> on 10-July-2012.
>
>
>
> This draft addressed the comments received from last WGLC
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd/current/msg00443.html
>
>
>
> Please respond to the ARMD mailing list with any statements of approval or
> disapproval, along with any additional comments that might explain your
> position. Also, if any ARMD participant is aware of IPR associated with this
> draft, please inform the mailing list and/or the ARMD chairs.
>
>
>
> Cheers, (sorry for the wrong wording in the previous announcement)
>
>
>
> Linda & Benson
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> armd mailing list
> armd@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd
>