Re: [armd] WG Action: Conclusion of Address Resolution for Massive numbers of hosts in the Data center (armd)

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Thu, 25 October 2012 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B740721F8960; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.982, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2JmqCfl0nXi7; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50D521F88F9; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUImPKbxcvv2z4gA5LGW1jdjdRCzi8q44@postini.com; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:12:45 PDT
Received: from P-CLDFE01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:11:47 -0700
Received: from o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.224) by o365mail.juniper.net (172.24.192.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:11:47 -0700
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (213.199.154.143) by o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:17:59 -0700
Received: from mail17-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.244) by DB3EHSOBE010.bigfish.com (10.3.84.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:11:45 +0000
Received: from mail17-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail17-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AC52201D8; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:11:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.245.197; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:CH1PRD0511HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
X-SpamScore: -24
X-BigFish: PS-24(z5b2kz9371I542M1432Izz1202h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL17326ah8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh1155h)
Received: from mail17-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail17-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1351192300423298_26121; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:11:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS014.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.254]) by mail17-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F103340067; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:11:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1PRD0511HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.245.197) by DB3EHSMHS014.bigfish.com (10.3.87.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:11:38 +0000
Received: from CH1PRD0511MB418.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.10]) by CH1PRD0511HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.159.37]) with mapi id 14.16.0224.004; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:11:15 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Action: Conclusion of Address Resolution for Massive numbers of hosts in the Data center (armd)
Thread-Index: AQHNsc+2UXvvFPDuQ0GplIXY/fYhh5fKYJeg
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:11:15 +0000
Message-ID: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2502C225@CH1PRD0511MB418.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20121023183252.7359.72200.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20121024100744.GA15377@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20121024100744.GA15377@nic.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.232.2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%NIC.FR$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%HUAWEI.COM$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
Cc: "ldunbar@huawei.com" <ldunbar@huawei.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "armd@ietf.org" <armd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [armd] WG Action: Conclusion of Address Resolution for Massive numbers of hosts in the Data center (armd)
X-BeenThere: armd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <armd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd>
List-Post: <mailto:armd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:12:45 -0000

Hello Stephane,

My apologies. The shutdown message should have included a pointer to the following email, which was posted on the ARMD mailing list by Benson Schliesser on June 22:

- http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd/current/msg00472.html

                            Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Stephane Bortzmeyer
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 6:08 AM
> To: IESG Secretary
> Cc: ldunbar@huawei.com; ietf@ietf.org; armd@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of Address Resolution for Massive
> numbers of hosts in the Data center (armd)
> 
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:32:52AM -0700,  IESG Secretary <iesg-
> secretary@ietf.org>; wrote  a message of 7 lines which said:
> 
> > The Address Resolution for Massive numbers of hosts in the Data
> center
> > (armd) working group in the Operations and Management Area has
> > concluded.
> 
> Its charter is far from completed and I do not find in the archives of
> the mailing list of the WG an explanation. Two lines of text to explain
> what happened?