Re: [armd] WG Action: Conclusion of Address Resolution for Massive numbers of hosts in the Data center (armd)

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 24 October 2012 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE4121F893E; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.041
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.041 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.208, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NFQQMrz-elK5; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [192.134.4.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A5421F8672; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 007E22804B3; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:08:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41A728050D; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:08:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2219:8::6:69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD89B380A2; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:07:44 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:07:44 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20121024100744.GA15377@nic.fr>
References: <20121023183252.7359.72200.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121023183252.7359.72200.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:32:49 -0700
Cc: ldunbar@huawei.com, ietf@ietf.org, armd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [armd] WG Action: Conclusion of Address Resolution for Massive numbers of hosts in the Data center (armd)
X-BeenThere: armd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <armd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd>
List-Post: <mailto:armd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:09:20 -0000

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:32:52AM -0700,
 IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote 
 a message of 7 lines which said:

> The Address Resolution for Massive numbers of hosts in the Data
> center (armd) working group in the Operations and Management Area
> has concluded.

Its charter is far from completed and I do not find in the archives of
the mailing list of the WG an explanation. Two lines of text to
explain what happened?