Re: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-03.txt [corrected one]

<david.black@emc.com> Fri, 29 June 2012 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA52621F88F0 for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.415
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.415 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.183, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p5JRrgwKjcuT for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (hop-nat-141.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D053021F88ED for <armd@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si02.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI02.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.55]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q5TKZig5019415 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:35:44 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.222.226]) by hop04-l1d11-si02.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:35:27 -0400
Received: from mxhub24.corp.emc.com (mxhub24.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.136]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q5TKZRgL006444; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:35:27 -0400
Received: from mx15a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.189]) by mxhub24.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.136]) with mapi; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:35:26 -0400
From: <david.black@emc.com>
To: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, <armd@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:35:26 -0400
Thread-Topic: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-03.txt [corrected one]
Thread-Index: AQHNU6os/VklBFXnpUO86uvKGPpp8ZcRxeIA
Message-ID: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE71208D3A9D6@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F6339500C9@dfweml505-mbx>
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F6339500C9@dfweml505-mbx>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE71208D3A9D6MX15Acorpemccom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Cc: ron@bonica.org
Subject: Re: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-03.txt [corrected one]
X-BeenThere: armd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <armd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd>
List-Post: <mailto:armd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:35:50 -0000

I support publication of this version of the draft as an Informational RFC.

Thank you for making the changes that I suggested in reviewing the -02 version.

Thanks,
--David

From: armd-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:armd-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 10:44 AM
To: armd@ietf.org
Cc: Ron Bonica
Subject: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-03.txt [corrected one]

Dear ARMD Participants -

This message begins a two week WG Last Call for http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement/, ending on 10-July-2012.

This draft addressed the comments received from last WGLC http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd/current/msg00443.html

Please respond to the ARMD mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval, along with any additional comments that might explain your position. Also, if any ARMD participant is aware of IPR associated with this draft, please inform the mailing list and/or the ARMD chairs.

Cheers, (sorry for the wrong wording in the previous announcement)

Linda & Benson