[armd] Network Virtualization Overlay Control Plane Requirements posted

Larry Kreeger <kreeger@cisco.com> Mon, 30 January 2012 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <kreeger@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF9B21F871A; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:40:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXP9az9QSgc1; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A05E21F8671; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:40:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=kreeger@cisco.com; l=3030; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1327952437; x=1329162037; h=date:subject:from:to:message-id:mime-version; bh=Eq+m/9Uw8hxigPzQcWOdpoWDgzEojDzGCKvO2jWXW2M=; b=Ni/XgITfdh4J/FbfK9nubiLxWtMEFhK3qNOvN2IXh/63CebYaNWlGzji z63QkGcgrsd7O/4rEywuUTXPpiz/j9R+2XAnQb7xgBs3XKpZ5OFB+FaPO WZCuTtLz9QLsOyiKWLCnumzCxr/3THJwbYIN0JmIAs1shSd4eZeZ74lOH A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkFAHPxJk+rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABDgk2jdwGHJmuBBYF0AQQBAQEPASoxHQEMAWgxAQQTCRIHh2OYcIEnAZ44iDYvBA8BCAEFCQYDCQEFCINUNS0BAwQICgESgxwEiD+MW5Jy
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.71,592,1320624000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="26150290"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2012 19:40:36 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0UJeaN2002189; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:40:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-21e.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.156]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:40:36 -0800
Received: from 10.21.146.181 ([10.21.146.181]) by xmb-sjc-21e.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.156]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([128.107.191.79]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:40:36 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:40:36 -0800
From: Larry Kreeger <kreeger@cisco.com>
To: nvo3@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CB4C3234.53546%kreeger@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Network Virtualization Overlay Control Plane Requirements posted
Thread-Index: AczfhwmCNjK0MgCDPkWJDbI3krxH/A==
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3410768436_38387553"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jan 2012 19:40:36.0566 (UTC) FILETIME=[09D86F60:01CCDF87]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:51:43 -0800
Subject: [armd] Network Virtualization Overlay Control Plane Requirements posted
X-BeenThere: armd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <armd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd>
List-Post: <mailto:armd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:40:37 -0000

To: nvo3 mailing list
Bcc: l2vpn, l3vpn, dc, armd, vpn4dc mailing lists

Hi everyone,

I have recently posted a first draft of the Control Plane requirements for
Network Virtualization Overlays.

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp-00.txt

This draft is a follow-up to draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01
( http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01
) which makes the case for overlay networks in data centers (not restricted
to L2 over L3) and the need for control plane solutions.

If you have not read draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01, I
highly suggest reading it first because the posted control plane reqs
document picks up where it left off.

Since the posted draft is a followup to
draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01 , and there is already an
NVO3 mailing list, please join and post any discussion and/or comments to
nvo3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Thank you,
Larry Kreeger