Re: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-02.txt
Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com> Sun, 01 April 2012 19:01 UTC
Return-Path: <talmi@marvell.com>
X-Original-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9A121F89E3 for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6hWr6bBZKWIm for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from galiil.marvell.com (galiil.marvell.com [199.203.130.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7092421F89CD for <armd@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com>
To: Benson Schliesser <bschlies@cisco.com>, "armd@ietf.org" <armd@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 22:01:39 +0300
Thread-Topic: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-02.txt
Thread-Index: Ac0GWw+3Iv6irbgxRFCmPhhbTLw0AgJ3mBJg
Message-ID: <74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C017E9730D22A@IL-MB01.marvell.com>
References: <20120312201556.19696.53552.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4298A010-14A4-4D54-862D-6225841170D1@cisco.com> <573146A8-49CC-4669-9B92-D33EC318AE6B@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <573146A8-49CC-4669-9B92-D33EC318AE6B@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-02.txt
X-BeenThere: armd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <armd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd>
List-Post: <mailto:armd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:01:55 -0000
Hi, Some comments are listed below. [Better late than never :] The document is well written, and IMO it is ready to proceed to the IESG processing. In section 2: Although these are very basic terms, I suggest to add the acronyms: ARP, ND, VLAN, ToR, EoR. Section 3 says "Today, it is not uncommon to support 10s of VMs per physical server." , while section 7.3 says "where a single physical machine now hosts ten (or more) VMs". ==>The number of VMs per physical server should be consistent in the two sections. Section 4.4.4 The first paragraph sounds like it describes a solution for address scaling, and not a problem. It would be best to rephrase. Section 4.5.2: "Virtualization also can place additional requirements on the Aggregation switches in terms of address resolution table size" This assumes the scenario from 4.4.2 "L3 to Aggregation Switches" - it should be clarified, or rephrased. In section 7: The following sentence does not seem relevant any more: "It is a future activity to determine which of these areas can or will be addressed by ARMD or some other IETF WG." Typos: "A switch used to aggregate network network connectivity from multiple racks." - the word network appears twice. "run applications that are are confined" - the word are appears twice. Regards, Tal Mizrahi. -----Original Message----- From: armd-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:armd-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benson Schliesser Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 7:34 AM To: armd@ietf.org Subject: Re: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-02.txt This is just a reminder: we are in WG LC for draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-02 until 26-Mar-2012. Please review and post comments of support, non-support, etc. Silence will be interpreted as consensus. But a discussion would be even better. Cheers, -Benson On Mar 12, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote: > The chairs would like to begin a 2 week Working Group Last Call on the ARMD Problem Statement document draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-02. (See the announcement message quoted below for reference.) Please read this latest version of the draft, and comment on the mailing list. This WG LC will close on 26-March-2012. > > Cheers, > -Benson and Linda > > > On Mar 12, 2012, at 3:15 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Address Resolution for Massive numbers of hosts in the Data center Working Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : Problem Statement for ARMD >> Author(s) : Thomas Narten >> Manish Karir >> Ian Foo >> Filename : draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement-02.txt >> Pages : 16 >> Date : 2012-03-12 >> >> This document examines address resolution issues related to the >> massive scaling of data centers. Our initial scope is relatively >> narrow. Specifically, it focuses on address resolution (ARP and ND) >> within the data center. >> >> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement >> -02.txt >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-armd-problem-statement- >> 02.txt >> >> _______________________________________________ >> armd mailing list >> armd@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd > _______________________________________________ armd mailing list armd@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd
- Re: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-… Benson Schliesser
- [armd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-armd-problem-statem… internet-drafts
- [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-stat… Benson Schliesser
- Re: [armd] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-armd-problem-… Tal Mizrahi