IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name

Ron Cohen <ronc@ieee.org> Mon, 30 August 2010 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ronc.ntear@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: arp222@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arp222@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093903A6844 for <arp222@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.271, BAYES_20=-0.74, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_57=0.6, MANGLED_DOMAIN=2.3, MANGLED_FORM=2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gGryp867J0lQ for <arp222@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40613A6842 for <arp222@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so3748373fxm.31 for <arp222@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WGBxIulZJvWJvSbNxCQaFyvE+FaKoRW9ElYAlZbpZhI=; b=W+EigebC6eeWdlbEzo4m2wsHV/F3me4qrSZK87k0sKApBqeb9tQ0jTANrCmKRqiGyy qADAn6pUy/QSjLLDaKdFpWXGJL3RlsRs+cMP10NNo60XkBFdLo71eaO/BzhpVx4NsAK0 l94GNjjPCt9U6holPDBrg2frlbK5bRMYxKouM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=AypgwzAhuUX0cHi3PerBB70tHDdgMlHMwSOITh61lZiQv4iWt/C2TDI03CD4LVs9Wb yS7WluspEJ8qyzlM8HqAvyiRY8n85Wwe52rcMmBpkMYto1kSa1cVBiNtXrn/wnNJzXYQ zDB8LiGgaSkbtrChCqILPxawqGAwNBdhfMfNU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.190.76 with SMTP id w12mr156058hbh.175.1283179745063; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: ronc.ntear@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.177.3 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <004401cb4580$7ebdf5e0$43548a0a@china.huawei.com>
References: <004201cb4535$cd451130$4b0c7c0a@china.huawei.com> <004401cb4580$7ebdf5e0$43548a0a@china.huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:49:04 +0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: YmTjzNmAbGUlbmRTXYechoTt22k
Message-ID: <AANLkTin8wm8=Ccv5qh8fzWJ-Lq9U-SvwVL+T5p2N4m1y@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ron Cohen <ronc@ieee.org>
To: Li Yizhou <liyizhou@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001485f1ebdee3355b048f0b902d"
Cc: arp222@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name
X-BeenThere: arp222@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <arp222.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arp222>, <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arp222>
List-Post: <mailto:arp222@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arp222>, <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:48:36 -0000

How about SAR4VAN: Scalable Address Resolution For Virtualization Aware
Networking?

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Li Yizhou <liyizhou@huawei.com> wrote:

>  How about just ARM(address resolution for massive nodes) or Armed(address
> resolution for massive end-nodes)? :)
>
>
>
> Yizhou
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* arp222-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:arp222-bounces@ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Linda Dunbar
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:46 PM
> *To:* arp222@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name
>
>  It has been pointed to us by several people that the name ARP222 is a
> little misleading. The main objective is to resolve issues associated with
> *A*ddress *R*esolution for *M*assive amount of VMs or virtual hosts/*N*odes
> in one broadcast *D*omain.
>
>
>
> What do you think if we change the name to *ARMD* or *ARMND*?
>
>
>
> Your opinion is appreciated.
>
>
>
> Linda Dunbar
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arp222 mailing list
> arp222@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arp222
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email