Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name
T Sridhar <tsridhar@force10networks.com> Mon, 30 August 2010 19:36 UTC
Return-Path: <tsridhar@force10networks.com>
X-Original-To: arp222@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arp222@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4F93A696B for <arp222@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.865
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.865 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.126, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AsXMM3sjRXgB for <arp222@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.force10networks.com (corp.force10networks.com [64.186.164.204]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3247D3A6814 for <arp222@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com ([10.11.10.113]) by exch7-sjc-fe.force10networks.com ([10.11.0.87]) with mapi; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:36:52 -0700
From: T Sridhar <tsridhar@force10networks.com>
To: "arp222@ietf.org" <arp222@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:36:51 -0700
Thread-Topic: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name
Thread-Index: ActFNcoOlonQryKGTsKJPvIV7C/iVQAD/E5gAC92TFAAnbY5sA==
Message-ID: <016D6D95AF0949478938DD97B5218DE6021802D06175@EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com>
References: <004201cb4535$cd451130$4b0c7c0a@china.huawei.com> <016D6D95AF0949478938DD97B5218DE6021802C60760@EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com> <00bc01cb4603$f11fcb30$4b0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <00bc01cb4603$f11fcb30$4b0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_016D6D95AF0949478938DD97B5218DE6021802D06175EXCHCLUSTER_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name
X-BeenThere: arp222@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <arp222.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arp222>, <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arp222>
List-Post: <mailto:arp222@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arp222>, <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:36:32 -0000
I am in favor of ARMD which could expand to "Address Resolution Mechanisms for large broadcast Domains". Thanks, Sridhar From: arp222-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:arp222-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:46 AM To: arp222@ietf.org Subject: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name It has been pointed to us by several people that the name ARP222 is a little misleading. The main objective is to resolve issues associated with Address Resolution for Massive amount of VMs or virtual hosts/Nodes in one broadcast Domain. What do you think if we change the name to ARMD or ARMND? Your opinion is appreciated. Linda Dunbar
- [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name Linda Dunbar
- Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name Li Yizhou
- Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name Ron Cohen
- Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name T Sridhar