Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name
Li Yizhou <liyizhou@huawei.com> Fri, 27 August 2010 00:40 UTC
Return-Path: <liyizhou@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: arp222@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arp222@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC5D3A6964 for <arp222@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.079
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_57=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D2yv4lejdUUk for <arp222@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D82C3A68A7 for <arp222@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L7S0027FCJU3T@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for arp222@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:40:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L7S00GW3CJTB8@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for arp222@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:40:41 +0800 (CST)
Received: from l63746 ([10.138.84.67]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L7S00G2XCJSCI@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for arp222@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:40:41 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:40:48 +0800
From: Li Yizhou <liyizhou@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <004201cb4535$cd451130$4b0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
To: 'Linda Dunbar' <ldunbar@huawei.com>, arp222@ietf.org
Message-id: <004401cb4580$7ebdf5e0$43548a0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_8HV5YCl7qMuhop0C5WN3rQ)"
Thread-index: ActFNcoOlonQryKGTsKJPvIV7C/iVQASmCJw
Subject: Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name
X-BeenThere: arp222@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <arp222.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arp222>, <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arp222>
List-Post: <mailto:arp222@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arp222>, <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:40:22 -0000
How about just ARM(address resolution for massive nodes) or Armed(address resolution for massive end-nodes)? :) Yizhou _____ From: arp222-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:arp222-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:46 PM To: arp222@ietf.org Subject: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name It has been pointed to us by several people that the name ARP222 is a little misleading. The main objective is to resolve issues associated with Address Resolution for Massive amount of VMs or virtual hosts/Nodes in one broadcast Domain. What do you think if we change the name to ARMD or ARMND? Your opinion is appreciated. Linda Dunbar
- [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name Linda Dunbar
- Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name Li Yizhou
- Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name Ron Cohen
- Re: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name T Sridhar