IETF Logo Mail Archive

[art] Re: draft-bray-unichars-09 review

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Wed, 09 October 2024 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C04C14F6BB for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=textuality.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F1qthOMvAmLl for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E2BC14F600 for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7e9fd82f1a5so2772230a12.1 for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 09:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality.com; s=google; t=1728490732; x=1729095532; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Y10xA4snWLC0o1aYKFmZipJNg4xWd7W3pgTEy8atv34=; b=dBpW/UBUzzU6JqPyzp2to31i/wj8L1nptmJTDVU24otI9GS7ShEBZIfsqzNTpQbFWR Mx8p+FdRx2TizxB/OFroVaJzfQHuPGqNxnoENUm1LAlrYTq1zZpwDzviy4AmrYoOI68i z/5ed1qdUQ9F37JHM/6ZWdL0wKH4Pu/fzUOX0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728490732; x=1729095532; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Y10xA4snWLC0o1aYKFmZipJNg4xWd7W3pgTEy8atv34=; b=BoSpYKx9+sbtqNnOelFUfsTTRFPY6q7CvJqgH2BwByIgSuRaHJe+ul8eidyo88lXU9 LgFrYl8ShZvWExEEL8FrovaZ1i3QYGA69NtLbZUjVtCuH4C1QbO1mO06m9qO2g06lkB/ Xk0Cn4eVqkfATC1EOH2HS6F1BSZgQcr2IiS6UJh/219XC/8bAJ6U3H98WvweitBNPU12 BwBPNO1/jBD8W4yceDgxhF/kCNS/NK5YtjywKAHM3UIUYprUzkv71ai3VbQbkV+cJw1g YpNiPnKISmMBAkv/EthqOYIzZHaFWre9gm4m0e/4iRw3CQ4ZtlmWrA3WeBLz9PEWn0es AlBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzyvT5lje6VvTKRJEKMNpaCzQnnlx7IxlojOJfZxgYDq4I/tKD8 bvund5jzTU4/En+1tNQNboY1Y0GsnzPJxi2lLpELTGH7d31v5DcmAEAy2tHs9jT0XCCD1/jYWq5 SAlXCs4RR2ZqeZus3yp5D27KkawlvbsNY0YbWco5LA/iPeTLK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGDXcwxuMhrMXwqDdCZ9B10atXcXSia73PjQPDqKhFlVjqrdKOk5TvD+cMC9gXbm2IKGQTFyZZ47GtquODMWxw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:dacc:b0:20b:a10c:9be3 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20c637112dcmr45409565ad.21.1728490731800; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 09:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:18:50 -0700
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:18:45 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mimestream 1.4.1)
References: <CAN8C-_JkHcer1MbvwSrtFxFu_38JRy-_JstYOmAMdOVCdCe-0g@mail.gmail.com> <70052f55-c9ca-4f92-99c0-7ec2381a8c15@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <70052f55-c9ca-4f92-99c0-7ec2381a8c15@gmx.de>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 09:18:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iuNLHVwCDt1405EVO_qO2uSPrdm=RQiAFgmjQ_BTMP1qA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke=40gmx.de@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000112e9b06240d9c50"
Message-ID-Hash: M7VVRGWSHLCZAJRG2Y45H7OIFZGAGXME
X-Message-ID-Hash: M7VVRGWSHLCZAJRG2Y45H7OIFZGAGXME
X-MailFrom: tbray@textuality.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-art.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [art] Re: draft-bray-unichars-09 review
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/-1Yu0-45aja2qTWc5YgtV9rDHyQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:art-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:art-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:art-leave@ietf.org>

On Oct 8, 2024 at 10:16:57 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke=
40gmx.de@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> On 04.10.2024 16:22, Orie Steele wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> ...
>
>
> So what's the intended status after publication? Proposed Standard, BCP,
> Informational?
>

Per RFC3967, “a  standards track document may not have a normative
reference to an informational RFC.” The goal of Unichars is to serve as a
useful reference, so I think it would need to be a standards-track doc.  -T

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status