IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-05

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 12 April 2022 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB9C3A0AFC; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pWMsUyPre8di; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56113A0AD9; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1neLUW-000g1o-8k; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:43:52 +0000
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:43:48 -0700
Message-ID: <m21qy2w3a3.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity.all@ietf.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR07MB422339ECD8AF268AB3EF59CC98ED9@VI1PR07MB4223.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <164936575713.6320.18195760378286197162@ietfa.amsl.com> <10652A23-5534-423B-B8AC-3320881CA38A@vigilsec.com> <m2tub3i5ws.wl-randy@psg.com> <VI1PR07MB422339ECD8AF268AB3EF59CC98ED9@VI1PR07MB4223.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/30d8z485V8i3Pa3oVV11faf3M1U>
Subject: Re: [art] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-05
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:44:04 -0000

> Tim: many thanks for this review. Randy, Russ: thanks for taking Tim’s
> comments into account. Very minor – I personally would vote for “The
> RPKI is for Authorization” to “To Summarize”, since that gives a
> better hint of the section content.

wfm if it works for russ, wg chairs, and ace

> I balloted DISCUSS on the document because I have a question about the
> chosen track for the document, but I expect to remove the block after
> a short discussion about it.

it was at first.  but the wg decided otherwise, pretty much because of
the really disgusting abuses.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email