Re: [art] On BCP 190

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 23 July 2019 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC7E12096F for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=iFo28Py2; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=D5e/PHBt
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1Pl66TYCIDE for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABF08120904 for <art@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9B621FC5; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:35:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:35:30 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject :date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; s=fm3; bh=e5usb+R H/F64D5UQMJ4IEsD0KaXeiVxFb4CUUBdiUU4=; b=iFo28Py2eSV8F3pMf8TobzW 9FGbLet471PV56G2n0F+fB9ZKxPG/aoFaXrikE4ZH6XPlWWf/ddUskksB0CeNjMw InqTpT5u2YmKOQt+mceeTfX2Lv/71XB067WuL7y3XfdvURqSzeIfRkA16dtjmbxL jvRIcQ2DTHF2lRu4akM9agZSsL8xDraTLYOuFxj7H3vf+JQf+8SlsLyr9pd82BdM Vwkc24zpi56rG+I8ER2y6Q68d8416WH+5g7kK/XAEiKreDeQgtWrFFQwU/C1EnCS Y7cW4yU8JdwA6s3L3oQ0CMAeBKlAsHFWJ1IQf1w8wR7O09jxzXPWT52V7E6pAeA= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=e5usb+RH/F64D5UQMJ4IEsD0KaXeiVxFb4CUUBdiU U4=; b=D5e/PHBt077AZakWnm3OqC/3Oa4K70QaEv57BSV4VAJIemC4lFDKJImyA Tb0cHm260EhmlD+Hp7m6yvLDMNSKz0HqQzaV9us2XIeQhDBiE7IB6n65uRHqec23 cPUvwqjCI5y1ieCoXrcVGXz4WWZXfYFIgI/2EQcPdsAg/uA05C7AD+C8fwDI1Xd+ LYTK0uU2TQV+HrEr2rBxRZUqKhNAL65PLlytpyEnrtbVGarUg10qN+mZidJDNZ6A IH33xpoJAQprtVS5CIm91Q7mEefA+iP9CP6h4VFmRcqzjErJeNrDigEY6uPPskTI R+R9BinfpoKufwD1rdtkm/D4GKchw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:kW83XeHjE-yYgVZb2coMaIBeYFs751f5ggflrVoExwq6CzmGzXXL0g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrjeekgdduheduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptgfghfggufffkfhfjgfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepfedurd dufeefrdduvdelrdegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohht rdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:kW83XbeReK4KIe2wyBnJx3k7XpoyE21DttxxoSttR2VX9audv6Pi1w> <xmx:kW83XUToqRCwkRXAOS0m-fTyK_EkS8nGZcDZ95nN0lyBMNfGON-ERA> <xmx:kW83XcvwYh-L-P4bzqrUeSiszN0l3EDjsGlSSPt4b-O4CAhlkk4B-Q> <xmx:km83XRhj5HXgPblGGjXsh_TTWGyUkBGfs0JwB5cuEDzcMEWY-yCw5A>
Received: from [31.133.129.4] (dhcp-8104.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.129.4]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 25B09380084; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:35:29 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:34:46 -0400
Message-Id: <42C8475A-6DFE-4DC6-B608-8159B90F9CDB@mnot.net>
References: <58BF6171-03BB-4F83-940F-3A101EFDD67F@mnot.net> <2ba63f8c-0f61-bd59-fbca-9d782a0d9818@mnt.se> <F81E44F7-7B51-4C68-9470-E94EFD2D4102@mnot.net> <e9780f61-681f-a5d9-7b06-549a2e652f5f@mnt.se>
Cc: art@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <e9780f61-681f-a5d9-7b06-549a2e652f5f@mnt.se>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16F203)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/4ciaXry1oXIwrFSfCFW7YwgV4k0>
Subject: Re: [art] On BCP 190
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:35:34 -0000

Please re-read; it’s to prevent future problems. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 23 Jul 2019, at 4:28 pm, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 2019-07-23 21:54, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 23 Jul 2019, at 3:34 pm, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Mark,
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In short, I'm not concerned about *this* IETF specification violating the BCP, I'm concerned when there are 1,000 specs that do so (which may not be that far away, given how many specs are being built on top of HTTP). 
>>> 
>>> Playing devils advocate: how is BCP190 then a BCP? I understand there
>>> may be an argument for the B and the C but if there are really 1000s
>>> of APIs that does what BCP190 say you MUST NOT, then in what sense
>>> does this represent Best Current /Practice/?
>> 
>> There aren't; I was speaking about the future.
> 
> 
> Ah so the BCP designation is aspirational? I personally think thats a
> problematic use of BCPs
> 
>    Cheers Leif