IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] New Version Notification for draft-touch-time-05.txt

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 12 November 2019 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F88B120819 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:32:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tnvuhaW0LuN3 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:32:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 213E412002E for <art@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:32:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:59276) by ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1iUWHr-0014ly-9K (Exim 4.92.3) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:32:51 +0000
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:32:51 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
cc: "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <748167A2-46AF-45D3-9CCB-339BF2123B7C@strayalpha.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1911121331500.10845@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <156834269242.16573.17240497030993366068.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <45c2fb64-1efd-68bf-4436-ec7bbb7bfc88@strayalpha.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1909131844350.5352@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <5320191a-09d4-4398-a242-e8d3ebb496d5@strayalpha.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1911111353350.10845@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <88C23DE6-C666-4071-97E7-5C271A54446A@strayalpha.com> <748167A2-46AF-45D3-9CCB-339BF2123B7C@strayalpha.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="1870870841-400743634-1573565571=:10845"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/5r4RR9Jdyn8YT9an24diSmo7RD8>
Subject: Re: [art] New Version Notification for draft-touch-time-05.txt
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:32:57 -0000

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
>
> The source above claims PTP tries to coordinate the local clock to TAI.
>
> That doc confirms it isn’t a time scale, as I originally indicated.

I'm struggling to understand why things like NTP and Unix and GPS are in
scope but PTP is not.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
people involved in running their communities

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email