IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] Against BCP 190

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 05:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD2F1200B2 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CSiURIuPuL18 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A63A120041 for <art@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id j5so75139673ioj.8 for <art@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TaUcEyivnkIWug0/DfsWxZLoyhLwn4BDAJ15dZlwrPA=; b=uG2vqyfhPzIHLqaw7caoRPeSdpqK7Pm29u5nMpuGwr07VQRmNomU2v3k4oVc6SLXOT 0r7nlyxDpmvMpRlVFedO7v3cXTa2l9/h3NwENUoZDm04aGx+vYT5IeF4eIuZK1jZE1M7 673flbum2UgwlDTuq8ZCTwbK4dUSx6LA8erHcTREcRYD5Rubm21/NRPcsVBJ0wMSn0Iy CD6lYP/GN8jB0U42GBDCIuARBNsDvtBx0xbCLrrZZmhSf1V5BnuSwosCZZbZjRNEceNx Lkw7OD4hvvz+Piz08WV/8ImDE0PmVXVznvFGQ+A0+dUpW9XqrDgkBpgsA0NDJOrIUeTr gWqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TaUcEyivnkIWug0/DfsWxZLoyhLwn4BDAJ15dZlwrPA=; b=LglYN8NoCSbmaB9EknaBwRmKH4lwzJ6CLusb/UxZTskqkb4yeLKCKt4M4x6VLs5/r5 c1YkA7FmIaEWicn4k3Ae18uW3GDZ2KzykrZUSNYPw9y1/xakGkVDNpshqKDvuq5CUcuM kJmpcim212ojf9FeMUqokm/XItkFOsv5YkGhJCSMqOeEVVgEqo+w6tDYMDq8r953Omm1 LzkYvOvqzuqn4nJ9HmalmfMGtijt6lrqlqeWfe3usyEoofk/P3Bu94WDXI15vQE1b1RN TQN2NHBKtChytI8ehIblvPQfsCkHf+rI1Ae2ZoLRf04UNxykyqbNAbjfDT34A/kbK7fj Pt8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXgC8pXHmWmPXhr8hcT+t2U17mcTHDnmudK9ear4UJ9fhMYITzb imd2MPO7GtqwZAzDiKmNG7oHRTMSQRt2eFCwbi11za5O
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxT1dSWRxa946QR0QpXUEqJsEHgFSDldREOzXBjkMvBIXJZAfDr36jQpBm/RSSyZQ5unvMjuo1neERsMBn2sZk=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b602:: with SMTP id g2mr68092985iof.54.1563861272535; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <791b33b8-4696-f69c-aca3-8838b2caafd8@sectigo.com>
In-Reply-To: <791b33b8-4696-f69c-aca3-8838b2caafd8@sectigo.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:54:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyYB9mHAx+AQSTVQvb2g5FvAD03KQ_Ta7=RH+6Pt8dKrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com>
Cc: "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a0aa24058e52d360"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Dg9aI1TPhSYImig_mEbRGb9gMAY>
Subject: Re: [art] Against BCP 190
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 05:54:35 -0000

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:46 AM Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com> wrote:

> ...since all modern
> web servers can trivially rewrite paths to query components and back
> again.
>

I don't think this assertion is correct. Query components don't reflect a
hierarchy, they are unordered, and can be repeated. They can be rewritten
to and from path segments, but not in a way that preserves their semantics.

thanks,
Rob

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status