[art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-10

Kirsty Paine via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 09 May 2022 13:33 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kirsty Paine via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr.all@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <165210320426.61998.17877339592893270186@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Kirsty Paine <kirsty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 06:33:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Gp7TtdCUrbmf6WJy4ATcmN_DYQI>
Subject: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-10

Reviewer: Kirsty Paine
Review result: Ready

This draft is clear, well-written and I find only one minor issue as follows:
- Abstract: It takes a while until the abstract tells me what the document does
and it doesn't cover the full scope of what it documents. I would move the last
sentence to the start, and then explain the backstory/specifics if it's still
needed, and include the information in the last paragraph of Section 1. This
will help interested readers find your draft and its relevance to them more
quickly.

[art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-b… Kirsty Paine via Datatracker
Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-i… Ketan Talaulikar
Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-i… Francesca Palombini
Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-i… Ketan Talaulikar