IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 13 April 2021 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7880C3A2557 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3yJ72Y6mlY2V for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FD663A2556 for <art@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1618343767; bh=aEBuAl9f7sYWo1TGDcWcnq3PSSrT2mPmOiJQ8o2b80s=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=EGTisHwvTpG4OXhY1EaaDx3riF0368vKlH8+tk07UMMx4dv3iaQT2mcyeq3YW0EX8 fXZwZF18tIGUJEMG0hHQjdVgzgWjthNWthax0i+n5NdIIWrQPlqCwM2l1bbA85Vna8 k3egOU7Eeh0EMYNtRHxSX4ekYhrmdU0EMVkTEjjI=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.50.232]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MXGvM-1l38cT0pRe-00YflJ for <art@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 21:56:07 +0200
To: art@ietf.org
References: <CAAyEnSMBdXCA0EvgR79P_1gi15pAPfeyu_HgGqgMjWxRP8sxKg@mail.gmail.com> <901F4345-91B6-42CA-9F68-27DB4C539F3D@vpnc.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <06564fc5-8d37-8b60-9e6c-063db13ef5f3@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 21:56:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <901F4345-91B6-42CA-9F68-27DB4C539F3D@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:pK0LZY6RpobkwZtMuh+JECmHgyNTpj78KRv6jzrhnw9JqaxyPm6 sVTf5I9wGqrZmQ2ThBjysXr1rh31pw0f+Czrm6fYIi23XcK4E10P2rJUfMt+AU0bA9SrPOk GmZiqUQnhTYXrgJv4eNAyWVMdJRZFUb0b/jYjfr6DXdDLjJIjgh35LGpwQ3rml5Bv/Cf9lK eFrIW0JQsfGyfuWJU4LyA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:YYSF8BHHAGw=:g+TVa3ITmBURvdqQZT6HiD YdThRYewm6Hi5imnHytYwxnG+JgejvGgkaJDFdNt498oQasp+HnLvxMamW3KuYkaFMmZmfplB 9cJP7ESxRSjt89tzsYb5UcGmkCx5n1+1Ce5TEG1qBdCX2kw+p6wMh7SC0LolqDjRvibtOVI03 cqqt9hkKmhh4JL9TzFycw5jHxUKZawSXnNe1sMJFKPaa9Xtm+/NmKFTwRUELOH+qL0JslT2or pA3Mfzhb8sLHvTMY9tdlB5KLzAwy8pqJINcHrOdizv/vu7Z1khHMtajxpxfiVB2YCo92RLrC6 2IX5UIqttI7IroWikRu8J280AoSl6LFTx26cxopwWCRN7dcDiESVis5GzinjxmZhwHbWNFUeW Dib98F9Zif0O+Gltxmk9ANkJG98HV1mDBsC2LHrDXgp7r0Lry4gYRCXXKK/loNhsOh398x5Oq CtOOEazmmFBF7o6C4Wu3O6HpumzOzbmUv3RSYYplWC1H0C+16EkxWt0LoCrk0PJm9ti6CCIwS Kj5U+6L4LW1NzT7okOI2biA3ryEV3/YaMDIib55UFcLkbmGRT6HFu1IxQaa8sDDJVmyI8ziVN TjxPLi9LAL6RgDyk+lVKY7z4Erx476nF5k8G+GoPizBXLLK45SuYqmkWY2QmT14ROmgnEZHtH h/PK6qKySl88dMtM87tEsRe07fTYMSTo3xdpefiE63G54hiCF6pWgc4ied/ljDX+sOqtky7Y2 OZXYovD8Hz71DP8lnJa6A2kcwWw6x1GXMlbNfbiTbI5aJ4Zn9+ceemgv5lJfz+sWyTzC7MIXZ 7Sz0Mw0d0Htrr7V/zEEG90TM2fw9pKkrioUimoQvpHHZAdhc4EpuWta+mAqizCevofMN6dENQ qVT5Ke/6sAyJPIqbMTMD38LfLbNohkFiPbIQJsFnWZIisu5joPq0lSDl3Ms9/E7xErg9IWwTu Ndths3rhLifPo+t7hRhVP644Nl6MpHlkD3ulvyVySpflqD1AZfulAiSWiBXYyjQmGUZ6arWlY Hl4HyPk1FUOxQ5w1I5p5xKn25AgccHqmBGzLp9Ik1ujKa9NUx9ehz57RoXKQMuYDQ8WWk1Y4L 7HtPt6rMx3InEunTSD3cbqbiJXmqSBLdgSiRy1qUb8mM0Z5LkCACXMYjYkVUx/aPCyUjvgEt/ xf40iHuKy54YTr/2JVkLLJdOJreGjglVfc78YByjhd7p24rYCuy1xiYNI5HXpJYlcGwPorsSV BOFCER761gSEQW7VX
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/K-yZvkBI_-6E9Rdh8KJyyyOovJ0>
Subject: Re: [art] [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:56:12 -0000

Am 13.04.2021 um 21:30 schrieb Paul Hoffman:
> ...
> Given that the date in that section of that draft is meant to be machine
> parsed, choosing RFC 5322 (neé 822) date formats is a particularly bad
> idea, given the existence of RFC 3339.

Absolutely.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email