IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 10 August 2017 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1144132139 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 17:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=IQG8/PMd; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=pBgsp2um
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fcr8I92xfdbu for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 17:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50E16131CB2 for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 17:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 45726 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2017 00:42:56 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=b29c.598bac10.k1707; bh=cRIijLu3WO+LwtPPPE++WZH5nls9OsWcFiCsnKG8UqA=; b=IQG8/PMdYITBDOj2ihMrWvy//M2Uq97dwBSrZTSEsDYwlVzPPkL7bvLnss61l1Vtu/H1rzLVaNY9iOGp91qn3nLO5Ih2eSPU4YWKuKIHSaroBd+QqHPSKIWtwnT6bwif9T+v0SwGMviQjE2XRbrUHjR3hFF9uDvVER6DIphk/f3xJRuy5Q82RCj0omoRL84CjehsUdMrYcEZHtLRKzfinhQAh+ihytywJrLXqfJ7gku6ebIuhIxWovZcJjdpw4vB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=b29c.598bac10.k1707; bh=cRIijLu3WO+LwtPPPE++WZH5nls9OsWcFiCsnKG8UqA=; b=pBgsp2umWrM7/yD+FCfTRudHgFnFNHQvLrcZRpAesMPwOTPwCR49qLQVBRPfY3PjbTC8DwGaREPLV3AH+tPl+xrkWIcxd5A1Stsrfm4gnZUZpaaaFHnT7+UFtQHscultOHxHCOq/pwrDkcc1Py7nA63Vrtljh4OzPiNvuUGU5LSjTwjpisjh+KzZG2ZBFnEOXsC6/JSyunUL+vqvmtnkS6osXy5Bxql9i/V8tKul10ljzg9aFapPXSmJVE497vT8
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 10 Aug 2017 00:42:56 -0000
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 20:42:56 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1708092042400.35726@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: art@ietf.org, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170809234436.8FE6481E236C@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <20170803003526.2349.qmail@ary.lan> <8cbaba50-a7d8-94b1-8cd0-fa8310e0b17d@bbiw.net> <47fcd0be-e4b6-2efc-266a-2eaef6243346@nostrum.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1708091935040.35501@ary.qy> <20170809234436.8FE6481E236C@rock.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/MZ35ZO8Uig9VXeeHCy1u-1LBtTI>
Subject: Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:43:00 -0000

On Thu, 10 Aug 2017, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> That would rather defeat the purpose here, since the goal is to identify
>> and ideally prevent name collisions.  Or are you saying that names for TXT
>> and for SRV or URI are separate namespaces?
>
> Unless you have non-overlapping syntax rules they can't be seperate
> namespaces.  As long as they both have a single prefix underscore
> they are both in the same namespace.

That's what I thought, too.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email