Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 10 August 2017 01:15 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D011324E9 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zgjmmxn-ncQT for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD5871324E6 for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v7A1FeJj005304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:15:41 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1502327741; bh=xlboeroLbonZqd+ZvYX0tRFXNdyx4heg/as295wpiKU=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=QILH+EGkNso/GjaOqFrtiTjPm+kgZPS1XMPkszq/GPYmt6/nIUorPMfJ1vKRaCjHQ yaxkmoOgE6uop3hlyb7/WyUwpnSeb7ZiQHTbNu5bmfkXPFaBhqmqRJyGAJkgnclLNf r1PIIlbIzwviauxf5Vwt9/7Zqf14GkHpO6Pxkmhg=
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
References: <20170803003526.2349.qmail@ary.lan> <8cbaba50-a7d8-94b1-8cd0-fa8310e0b17d@bbiw.net> <47fcd0be-e4b6-2efc-266a-2eaef6243346@nostrum.com>
Cc: art@ietf.org
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <04c36ea8-dbf4-1e01-4982-dd07863a18b1@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 18:15:03 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <47fcd0be-e4b6-2efc-266a-2eaef6243346@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/RsvttUAnSKI9SntCft8c84EGMT0>
Subject: Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 01:15:13 -0000
On 8/9/2017 4:25 PM, Adam Roach wrote: > I would recommend documenting and registering the underscore leaf nodes > used by TXT records as a completely separate concern and in a different > IANA table Adam, (Leaving for later, all other comments about the note, other than to say thanks for reading the draft, thinking about it, and commenting...) Your above seems to be calling for two registries that assign out of the same namespace. (Being specified in the same document doesn't matter if there are two tables.) I'm hoping I've seriously misunderstood, since the entire goal of my simplification proposal is to avoid exactly that. Please to set me right. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf tjw ietf
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Cullen Jennings
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John C Klensin
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John R Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Mark Andrews
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John R Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Dave Crocker
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Dave Crocker
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John R Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John R Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Mark Andrews
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John R Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Dave Crocker
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Dave Crocker
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Mark Andrews
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Tim Wicinski