IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] Against BCP 190

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 12 July 2019 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5911202A6 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=QfadITQI; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=MCOINlxb
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iHqsBe8znmKE for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5586B120225 for <art@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.143.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x6CJlJSF027191 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1562960850; x=1563047250; bh=nipJYgyLGCVK5C7+kZZFbtbrDAQzS0ZtlcvvSLL3gZE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=QfadITQIsDp+BvQTLJNko4Fml1aBvsRo8BHEmbv/MZgwydP5eRHzoyYzBFPufpZI2 io9yxHJcxx2RdS24/kgjkdcQE8vjHs8xB4D+zzR5UJLRlpUk7xaskk+5O6FSSLjMgM HPJS1m1xiAPm3k/pmid81WOK42bCsCpFNo3dCUBQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1562960850; x=1563047250; i=@elandsys.com; bh=nipJYgyLGCVK5C7+kZZFbtbrDAQzS0ZtlcvvSLL3gZE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=MCOINlxbuO6aHxARzjr4YcRT9fQ1gtKn11DnF6tSKZjZO+Dd4OmsQiFOC13Z9u5Xu o3VSdwU/tYMRoewO5n0A//jt9b6+F18bE2Fdqgs0E4EZpRyfjUWP/xQ3v3nre6ZNrV gN06fdHF+yFFjAabpgLHG/CMnoFZ3/XH6UBKlkWc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190712124133.0bf7b938@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:46:18 -0700
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, art@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <791b33b8-4696-f69c-aca3-8838b2caafd8@sectigo.com>
References: <791b33b8-4696-f69c-aca3-8838b2caafd8@sectigo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/TQkfkIfVeg79FajmbIDjOQPe7Jk>
Subject: Re: [art] Against BCP 190
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:47:35 -0000

Hi Mark,
At 09:45 AM 12-07-2019, Rob Stradling wrote:
>During IESG review of RFC6962-bis (Certificate Transparency Version
>2.0), BCP 190 is creating significant problems in standardizing
>HTTP-based APIs.  Specifically, this paragraph of section 2.3

There was a comment from Stephen about Section 2.3 of what became RFC 
7320.  Do you remember whether it was addressed and how, if that is the case?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email