IETF Logo Mail Archive

[art] Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-12

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 23 October 2024 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39276C180B42; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WrN0CrilUEJj; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE535C157937; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: relay.sandelman.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=sandelman.ca header.i=@sandelman.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dyas header.b=hd1zY74z; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [5.148.108.178]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690B21FFDC; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:31:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5F5DAB71C; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:50:36 +0100 (BST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=dyas; t=1729713036; bh=qyqx1d0YrH7Jc8Zotoqce2RnfErXiWudSXRyhLU48po=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=hd1zY74z1paQafWOLts0w+WCLkkYF0NWl4ibZT4c46iqY57gXLuq/fS2TF+qwPEIm U5XRF6jAVZZ5WM0gXVrOyi2gOsNBotjfXx3tRdcGQOr/ESUzpWY1ux+STIWMaAQFaD wjNrj9AfbnhTUioD3Zyylphii9IOITudkMOtrMp/Uqdj95En3Ko6ABtw2x4H89ocE1 klsRydOtnOlYFhpbE5LGPVFeztYX3EDb4UAueeBqleB3KHxqZhnn2u3jBtLv+nGl0T 3ydGXZ/Is0iuQxRCFDYJmT4YwSQHdzc62ZOYkK5zgn4rJPHK3VvRorFiYgJ3/rxJy5 rIr8vUXPvAvHw==
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27C3AB6B1; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:50:36 +0100 (BST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
In-reply-to: <172868240607.453000.258546936031136251@dt-datatracker-78dc5ccf94-w8wgc>
References: <172868240607.453000.258546936031136251@dt-datatracker-78dc5ccf94-w8wgc>
Comments: In-reply-to Jim Fenton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> message dated "Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:33:26 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:50:36 +0100
Message-ID: <630860.1729713036@dyas>
Message-ID-Hash: HIFS7XNASUP52P365Q24PBUACJAZ57XY
X-Message-ID-Hash: HIFS7XNASUP52P365Q24PBUACJAZ57XY
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-art.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: art@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [art] Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-12
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/W_3pMMVxhxDK7FWqp6wJAPPdlGc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:art-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:art-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:art-leave@ietf.org>

Jim Fenton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
    > My biggest question about this draft is why it is separate from
    > ietf-anima-rfc3866bis. It appears to be an extension to rfc3866bis, yet
    > 3866bis is still being considered by the working group. 3866bis defines

So, because we started jws-voucher long before we realized we'd have to
revise 8366.   Putting all the different signing algorithms into one document
might make sense if we were starting now, but OTH, it might just confuse
people when they look for examples.

In the end, we had to put all the YANG into a single document.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status