[art] Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-raw-technologies-10

Pascal Thubert <pascal.thubert@gmail.com> Fri, 11 October 2024 09:24 UTC

Return-Path: <pascal.thubert@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BCFC1516E0; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 02:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fkztfOd76odx; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 02:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980D0C151539; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 02:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e2b9480617so1470616a91.1; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 02:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1728638693; x=1729243493; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XmvgAAI881sXmLEztuDD2X2RAhGypOTLy0u4iNnchDU=; b=hd/oNcvyxx+1TV4C1mSdVq2JJMVEP8IDVatgZphWbS50S7YsxtMlWeOx0LFfWJlOdS 8hfBiundQJMSQ0yzuY6W5evVE1F5LTyjJBqZnG+lKauJdGdYzqDYKN+L9GtayicUh+Qh lxoqlrwl4KsllOga7CdlQ9bF0D3J3Ojfn+MI3n+Ze6sgr6issFQnffyxs2cyOAADdDLf NQ2j9WMaPC88M3ZMOUzoUJk2TGNrUrDGEZLOYtI8L3u85IwoZa+hoKU8Skx5YyZlN3hf WoMM5tKHJM2oZ1+Fb3EuaR6OUZKqCEMgdXlu2xG3PMxLIaLAub+KCd6e57mDYnkWGmRM 1mDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728638693; x=1729243493; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=XmvgAAI881sXmLEztuDD2X2RAhGypOTLy0u4iNnchDU=; b=IrhWPPF+ww+ANG7GJTH1zya3NeRzBs5LWcuMvmoTod/MzTsF49dy6Q9VCEdSUK+QIY 9ln6ZwGURleqeRzciY/Rm4lcy6hCrHiqVafTb283f4wTRQbZgkyWkzqHwHEgtpwQpTA6 Vce7w5iXh5twNJnCp3POWPKvh77lrmD6TQLFEZ9gfmEKL9XCZwFq+3gQBNIUID7rXgzz 5MssXjByhxjZHZvs84AFpeLgS0CeSipFZURV6/kDNMDMxJr/o6prUULgWWbp3QH+EZll y2vJa3fpapGzte4zFOROxnGKo7T/FWDSr62w+jxefXnnGsgvh9MrZWi8cLgoAzKocXrb obig==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU2S/7UZJaTcRKBOw+uFGVRSou+U5PezGkH+wpOMP/oql7hCiTBwev0obiA2mFZu6eYvWHv0h91HLeq@ietf.org, AJvYcCUIU9bP+lIb0+sd+BmkQUoUcKFRyNPnmMyJf96B5Zylh71XGa2ndNKp7pMKHhcIjWA0LyBLZB4=@ietf.org, AJvYcCWReHYlfO33dVJb2Ru+hoj4vIpYKm6fVwH4xw6UG44J0kSHxy7cXx8g6P+dJ3Z3Kry/ZvLMAC1ZyGcc0wanG6z1hqKftgW6umAvJs+euQIEqA==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxC81Xw4Z0X3KhmtL175AV+5Ot5vkpRvnyL413ahY032zwKDtw/ sf6thf6qUlwoRtPhBq0XRZ8w3Lf8vst0JwDxMv7JKHa6d401HMvbnwPGXUcp7FSjQzQnNdSB7cx tmZG0+6zAfQvB4cYtJZQZHED6OG0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEjj0JE6h87dOxCp6XIrAWsTdYm+pMWCI0sxqqaGVjBQW9gX/hRawZD8bAl2w5MJcP+9bvAxROnFz94Kn2fYeg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b8e:b0:2e2:eaa0:7103 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e2f0dccf55mr2218091a91.39.1728638692949; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 02:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <172596952020.2797324.1336624106587549363@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp>
In-Reply-To: <172596952020.2797324.1336624106587549363@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp>
From: Pascal Thubert <pascal.thubert@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:24:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CADPqcJ+yT00CGGhCXQGR92pjxn5PFKf0gm8uf57qh65hn2YqDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003d07440624300fab"
Message-ID-Hash: VFBY6SN4NHAILET2ZOOEMKXAZDIXZDME
X-Message-ID-Hash: VFBY6SN4NHAILET2ZOOEMKXAZDIXZDME
X-MailFrom: pascal.thubert@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-art.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: art@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org, draft-ietf-raw-technologies.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [art] Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-raw-technologies-10
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Yd-4-ox1_3Ld5YBi-wN7xVvekSA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:art-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:art-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:art-leave@ietf.org>

Hello Jiankang

Many thanks for your review!
Please see below:

Le mar. 10 sept. 2024 à 13:58, Jiankang Yao via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> a écrit :

> Reviewer: Jiankang Yao
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned ART-ART reviewer for this draft. The Art Area
> Review Team (ART-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-raw-technologies-10
> Reviewer: Jiankang Yao
> Review Date: 2024-09-10
>
> Summary: Almost Ready for publication.
>
> This document presents a series of recent reliable and available wireless
> technology evolutions. It is very useful. The document is very long, and
> there
> still have some nits. It needs further improvments.
>
> One suggestion:
>
> Every section in sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 has the subsection"summary".
>
> How about adding a new section "summary" which tries to summarize all
> sections
> from 4 to 7?
>
>
Variations of this proposal were suggested during this round of review. To
keep the document structure I tend to like a bit better Mallory's idea to
push the summary section up in the protocol section.
Does that work for you?

Again, many thanks;

Pascal



> Best Regards
> Jiankang Yao
>
>
>
>

-- 
Pascal