Re: [art] "Home" documents for HTTP APIs
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 23 March 2017 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE30129A48 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TuKKvPmdEjJ7 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C05F129A45 for <art@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2NGhrfC026425 for <art@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:43:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DCCCDC2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.205.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vpsnj3ZxtzDJ9q for <art@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:43:53 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <5CB15D9F-D50F-4A78-8AC0-21B835534D23@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:43:53 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 511980232.904076-a7e1c4a00d64d31d09f617de29acd8f6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B79C6EDA-D07D-41B8-BEE5-CE13AB2C044A@tzi.org>
References: <5CB15D9F-D50F-4A78-8AC0-21B835534D23@mnot.net>
To: art@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/bO3gJ0K0rfpAPQWo-dWzeiNSQP4>
Subject: Re: [art] "Home" documents for HTTP APIs
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:44:13 -0000
draft-ietf-core-links-json just finished second WGLC in core. That is clearly solving a different problem (making RFC 6690 available in JSON/CBOR), but I can’t help noticing that there are some commonalities. RFC 6690, of course, is the “home document” for CoRE. Also, OCF has /oic/res, which is in the same mold. No idea whether this semblance should have any impact on either document, but maybe food for thought. (Yes, I have read Appendix D. Maybe I should point to draft-hartke-t2trg-coral as one take on the “form” gap. Input on this is very welcome over in T2TRG.) Grüße, Carsten [resent this because of "Message has implicit destination” breakage.]
- [art] "Home" documents for HTTP APIs Mark Nottingham
- Re: [art] "Home" documents for HTTP APIs Carsten Bormann
- Re: [art] "Home" documents for HTTP APIs Mark Nottingham