IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] Call for Consensus: Re: On BCP 190

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D831B120A16 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4n6TgRQk-WNC for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5CAE120A05 for <art@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x7KJMHAw084589 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:22:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1566328940; bh=EIsQKQpSM8DBA/SAR2iGCLTDuITxHsW1lnddXMOhe1I=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=OP87WxZSidlSTZVuy94A7O+2PnX4bxmjJ1Ie1kYVFgd3/DPHAIC+6T90Yj8cFHsDu EZx0iyjqrnTXEUZfVkDt/wBzK04ruQIi0DrMSnPzheLG2Cu/B7V9pt4XR+g6rHeKeF IjXmkczdEhdMhnM8Eyy1PgZWNvGVcfLefiiH4mO8=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be MacBook-Pro.roach.at
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@letsencrypt.org>, ART Area <art@ietf.org>, Devon O'Brien <devon.obrien@gmail.com>
References: <58BF6171-03BB-4F83-940F-3A101EFDD67F@mnot.net> <CAN3x4Q=Jo1uBvfCG6CSrociYgdG+E4jq+4cB1txPjgboth2q9g@mail.gmail.com> <372FA049-7B33-4981-A0E0-41BD454CB770@mnot.net> <CAN3x4QmJsfx48MdhcBB+XWX+vfv=skSR2Z6kNPBWGVobvzNuFA@mail.gmail.com> <004601d5450d$62b33220$28199660$@acm.org> <CAN3x4Q=XR+=ugv6HEmOgsA6v64GkQ+4u-Hk+OBQ0Lp9jn-Cy=A@mail.gmail.com> <D154BA24-5027-4FAF-8779-CBA5533D24A1@mnot.net> <3000e948-14e6-80d2-e8e6-766d309c361c@nostrum.com> <ed64dc0e-5b71-63ec-cbac-85673c51109a@nostrum.com> <301DF34E4C5601BCA4D2BCBF@PSB> <A27BC0BC-B60A-44AD-B75B-859C71B0706A@mnot.net> <E02E5D4BA18EF0155B0EAE95@PSB> <80bb60b7-cdc7-0df8-6a33-726839b15dfe@nostrum.com> <C4BE71284D3C8DCA4F8F2187@PSB>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <cecdb623-b6cd-ab60-12d2-b5030c0692b9@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:22:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C4BE71284D3C8DCA4F8F2187@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/jprsbOqUR7FljjCJxOty0B2YoCc>
Subject: Re: [art] Call for Consensus: Re: On BCP 190
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:22:26 -0000

On 8/20/19 1:33 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> I'd
> be happier with a statement from you that, instead of saying
> that you are clearing the Discuss because Mark is working on a
> revision


Thanks for giving me a chance to clear this up, since it's not what I 
meant, although I can see how the structure of my email may 
inadvertently give that impression.

The rationale for clearing my DISCUSS is:

> I think that these responses combined with the input received during 
> IETF 105 are a weak signal that that there is support for adjusting 
> BCP 190 at least to the extent necessary to allow the "provisioned 
> directory prefix" approach used by CT.


The mention of updating the document is a follow-on from this 
observation, but not at all the rationale for clearing the discuss.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email