[art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6932)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 12 April 2022 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9C13A0D14 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N483pJ9xGOym for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C07713A0D06 for <art@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id E31526AACF; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: standards@taugh.com, mx0dot@yahoo.com, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, superuser@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mannyman4208@gmail.com, art@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220412185133.E31526AACF@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:51:33 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/k748LDWPLjK6Kcioah8i7rdIA8Y>
Subject: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6932)
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:51:40 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7505,
"A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No Mail".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6932

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Jesus Alvarado <mannyman4208@gmail.com>

Section: 2119

Original Text
-------------
RFC7507]  Moeller, B. and A. Langley, "TLS Fallback Signaling Cipher
           Suite Value (SCSV) for Preventing Protocol Downgrade
           Attacks", RFC 7507, April 2015.
It should say:

[RFC7507]  Moeller, B. and A. Langley, "TLS Fallback Signaling Cipher
           Suite Value (SCSV) for Preventing Protocol Downgrade
           Attacks", RFC 7507, April 2015,
           <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7507>.


Corrected Text
--------------
RFC7507]  Moeller, B. and A. Langley, "TLS Fallback Signaling Cipher
           Suite Value (SCSV) for Preventing Protocol Downgrade
           Attacks", RFC 7507, April 2015.
It should say:

[RFC7507]  Moeller, B. and A. Langley, "TLS Fallback Signaling Cipher
           Suite Value (SCSV) for Preventing Protocol Downgrade
           Attacks", RFC 7507, April 2015,
           <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7507>.
[RFC7505] may of 2015 is the date of the pki updated 

Notes
-----
All the old tls got affected by cyrpto problems and clean a mass build up from the computer get hit by every Trojans from tech and government sides and everyone that is still playing with Trojans keeps getting foreign Trojans as well.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7505 (draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No Mail
Publication Date    : June 2015
Author(s)           : J. Levine, M. Delany
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : ART Area General Application Working Group
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG