Re: [art] summary of updates - draft-time-touch

John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU> Wed, 19 April 2017 03:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jhawk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A02A129417 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H3rLkOo4oj3i for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu [18.9.25.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1B411293F2 for <art@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190f-667ff7000000164b-1b-58f6d32ff492
Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 9B.E0.05707.F23D6F85; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 23:02:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id v3J32639007797; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 23:02:07 -0400
Received: from localhost (contents-vnder-pressvre.mit.edu [18.9.64.11]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jhawk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id v3J3246d014105; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 23:02:05 -0400
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 23:02:04 -0400
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Cc: art@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170419030204.GB87484@mit.edu>
Mail-Followup-To: John Hawkinson <jhawk>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, art@ietf.org
References: <20170329015811.GL7490@localhost> <111c86bc-c2c5-5050-edc0-82e40d36c570@isi.edu> <m1ctEy7-0000G9C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <70bae467-8636-379c-7452-21cacf03215f@isi.edu> <m1ctFHX-0000HSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <37dae716-fb6b-a933-d1fa-0a875ab66408@isi.edu> <236d8d65-71b2-cebf-b7eb-54b0c5464399@isi.edu> <8942ad3f-c151-26a1-1619-b0f36d78b5f0@isi.edu> <m1d0UPH-0000DqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <0751aeaa-56ae-e953-3b76-308a6a3478b4@isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0751aeaa-56ae-e953-3b76-308a6a3478b4@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpkleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT0dW//C3CYEaLjsWKux4Wr6e0sFqs +zOXxYHZY8mSn0weu99vZfFY+LCHMYA5issmJTUnsyy1SN8ugStj7b1vTAWLuSrObepiaWCc wdHFyMkhIWAiMW33crYuRi4OIYE2Jom3hx8yQjgbGSVerH8J5fxhlDj9bDojSAuLgKrExh1f wWw2ARWJOd9vsoPYIgKyEg/+vAGzmQUEJC6vuwhWIyxgIfFybx8ziM0roCPxeMV9Jgg7WOLD pL1Qq88xS8x5MZ8RIiEocXLmExaIQVoSN/69BGrgALKlJZb/AzubU8BaYunyO2C7RIFumHJy G9sERsFZSLpnIemehdC9gJF5FaNsSm6Vbm5iZk5xarJucXJiXl5qka6JXm5miV5qSukmRlBI c0ry72Cc0+B9iFGAg1GJh9dA/FuEEGtiWXFl7iFGSQ4mJVHemMVAIb6k/JTKjMTijPii0pzU 4kOMEhzMSiK8M7cB5XhTEiurUovyYVLSHCxK4rziGo0RQgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkZDg4lCd47 F4EaBYtS01Mr0jJzShDSTBycIMN5gIabgtTwFhck5hZnpkPkTzEqSonzrgZJCIAkMkrz4HrB KYfTgfsVozjQK8K8s0CqeIDpCq77FdBgJqDBEQFfQAaXJCKkpBoYo3k5JEPm7ikwOjFbRq7p Rs1MzaDs1NzPC3dtn5NjtqbQq/XS7v8sZvu++lz9b8Dl7X6Eb++Gr6G8q49LF4vPm6f7UPzb +TKObGZluWWvPuT7/mHd2nL5Se5HFcvNsnuX71AXZ3e63RV1MvKX5h9dl5jrUxOe5nRH+GwU epNuubB5eVjdXsPHSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAz/AapBQDAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/m-D0W0Ppxtr158OsXnImfEoogSA>
Subject: Re: [art] summary of updates - draft-time-touch
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 03:02:10 -0000

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote on Tue, 18 Apr 2017
at 08:03:38 -0700 in <0751aeaa-56ae-e953-3b76-308a6a3478b4@isi.edu>:

> > The '25ns' sillyness of GPS with respect to TAI is still there. I now have
> > an idea where the 100ms for NTP is coming from. That's really sad.
> can you clarify?

A problem here is that your ID conflates a known offset with
with a typical uncertainty with a theoretical maximum uncertainty.
You label the field "d-TAI" and name it a delta, but it isn't one.
And the name is evocative of DUT1, which is different kind of thing.

It might be better to adopt a standard name for this field
(uncertainty? imprecision? +/-?; I am not sure) rather than coining
your own.

> The 25ns of GPS is the result of a claim in the GPS spec.

You should probably cite it explicitly.

> The 100ms is from a claim in NTP documentation.

You should *definitely* cite this one explicitly. While I have no doubt
it is there, that's not what people with untuned run-of-the-mill
ntp systems encounter in the public Internet. (And I'm not sure
it is really an upper bound either -- I don't think a 101ms error
is appreciably less likely than a 99ms error?) And of course,
people with finely tuned ntp systems easily achieve far better than 1ms.

--jhawk@mit.edu
  John Hawkinson