[art] Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-eastlake-fnv-28

[Erik Auerswald <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 01:46:41PM -0700, Barry Leiba via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Barry Leiba
> Review result: Not Ready
> 
> As this is documenting an existing algorithm that was not developed
> in the IETF, we have no control over the substance of the document,
> so I am not commenting on that: it is what it is.
> 
> And that's exactly my issue with this: it's in the wrong stream.
> The shepherd writeup says that it was not developed in the IETF and
> there's no reason to put it on Standards Track, but also says that
> there's no reason it "needs to go to the ISE".  I disagree: this is
> *exactly* the sort of document that the Independent stream is there for.
> There is no meaningful sense of IETF consensus on this -- all we can
> have is consensus to publish it as is.
> 
> Ultimately, the IESG, not my review, will decide the right answer here.
> Please consider asking the ISE to move this to the Independent stream,
> where I think it should have been taken in the first place.  Thanks.

I also think that the Independant Stream would be a better fit for
this document.

Br,
Erik