IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] Call for Consensus: Re: On BCP 190

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088AD120960 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yuBb9TIu2pWG for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B38C9120104 for <art@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bens-macbook.lan (cpe-66-25-20-105.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.20.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x7KFUJZb043362 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:30:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1566315021; bh=/k43Lz9n5G29+kzu3rTaqEw4dyhgr2xcMr6nRQS5OHk=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=cxG0LixXPYvIKUqD/AoZn6Ss8x8tEEmjNFsKvApK9gGtUjmClqSbAqoGs958w6uvl IKqHM89XamwGbdxm9XxsjAT+5UnQmjDNosUTDsVdejng22jV/NkcK//cZPDMpX/wWE /Jy9QHXKfqbI1nTGQnElRoqIgzR0j+bOxLthm2O0=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-20-105.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.20.105] claimed to be bens-macbook.lan
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <52942FE2-6C74-4E45-A077-B3004A3FC6D3@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_676E4210-2FE5-4514-8B77-55FED77EF131"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:30:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <E02E5D4BA18EF0155B0EAE95@PSB>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@letsencrypt.org>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Devon O'Brien <devon.obrien@gmail.com>, ART Area <art@ietf.org>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <58BF6171-03BB-4F83-940F-3A101EFDD67F@mnot.net> <CAN3x4Q=Jo1uBvfCG6CSrociYgdG+E4jq+4cB1txPjgboth2q9g@mail.gmail.com> <372FA049-7B33-4981-A0E0-41BD454CB770@mnot.net> <CAN3x4QmJsfx48MdhcBB+XWX+vfv=skSR2Z6kNPBWGVobvzNuFA@mail.gmail.com> <004601d5450d$62b33220$28199660$@acm.org> <CAN3x4Q=XR+=ugv6HEmOgsA6v64GkQ+4u-Hk+OBQ0Lp9jn-Cy=A@mail.gmail.com> <D154BA24-5027-4FAF-8779-CBA5533D24A1@mnot.net> <3000e948-14e6-80d2-e8e6-766d309c361c@nostrum.com> <ed64dc0e-5b71-63ec-cbac-85673c51109a@nostrum.com> <301DF34E4C5601BCA4D2BCBF@PSB> <A27BC0BC-B60A-44AD-B75B-859C71B0706A@mnot.net> <E02E5D4BA18EF0155B0EAE95@PSB>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/xYbSYH67rnlOIzB1v4dOkznTUko>
Subject: Re: [art] Call for Consensus: Re: On BCP 190
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:30:26 -0000

Commenting on just one point (I am agnostic on the others):

> On Aug 20, 2019, at 5:55 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> 
> Mark,
> 
> Happy to wait, but a few comments going forward:
> 
> * For Adam, there is some question in my mind about whether it
> is desirable to clear a Discuss based on a plan about a document
> that has not been written yet, that has no firm schedule, etc.

In this case, I think Adam is saying that we don’t have consensus that the draft in question is really wrong.

It could take months to years to figure out what we really want BCP190 to say. I agree with Adam that we should not hold  current work hostage to that. Holding up work due to non-critical externalities is a very good way to kill momentum.

[…]


Thanks!

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email