[Asdf] Weekly github digest (ASDF Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 14 March 2021 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45303A1EA1 for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 23:46:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=jOS3ekC8; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=nUNNxC6X
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wgn6xDP9PEu2 for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 23:46:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51B983A1EA0 for <asdf@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 23:46:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D257417E6 for <asdf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:38:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:38:47 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm2; bh=we+GRWssH7earsSZ/SNQfDxIy5OLp+WX5QcTnJ+mNPA=; b=jOS3ekC8 dAZ2Z0kWMUCSkXnZ4+HikceyZ3QwjJS+XaCAEc71OiWuoFeFB5B39yrqMRyagB9z fGdWKMVbTudlt2nZmIAgragWRD6TfP0SNyUjKP4y8XvJQfQ7SyS1l70xMQaimYUo +n3neW2ZvGiSxGX3bkbMznn7gM2ri3VMj0lr2cNByG6X2AxhKT1UBeullf1M5PtL n3SNzq7/lTwRJ3kx1vdLaKlYBzGXmqcekW1p8M5AE+LRmaC9K+nIHQ3KRiYglYP3 tjP4oLW6OsdFvs7bl1ZEPzpwynWuBNNzKqpF1Nsdv0idZVXs4ZuvltYygiw98F/2 R+CkKhT39C1wXQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=we+GRWssH7earsSZ/SNQfDxIy5OLp +WX5QcTnJ+mNPA=; b=nUNNxC6XOcMipwEWjcpHgOQfDrZYo6C19FiiUxjhCGrTr bag05BmymdU3kmTZvNvFnuH4OfQe3nr07oGIr0PmZybL8l5JyQDFI3OkyLIrM/Hy NCjBHwxzCwdnVn/1xXtwCT39KLJJ2ryBaachErPbtXYqjZqEWttmv8tp5rLrvHv1 6kjoQZylp3QiULnbXaI042l22KULJYkqg+gz6Kknuz+0gJT0K/M9HcjFcMkSj2Hi nNAlOdVKdFWnmvsqRTWjxX1kXAPEz2BomS98Yujweb5U1grzqaGWcNNuyywkaMsx ARe1g0XySupoDZB6fYJ78oQ9HvpdJOjEKD8p4dyEg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:h71NYJeNOvIsFAfrU158nuhw6ZdBaexEmoyx9OGNM_Su9v4LWhW6nw> <xme:h71NYHMPTn90YAZMMs1ru9NzM0nY01Z7K75E4xunBmCc0bA03Wg0dVrfaMqKz9jVU bJPev-w4g0kgCTVgg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddvhedgkeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejne cuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicutegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceu ohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefgfefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieet necuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphepvdefrddutddurddugeehrd dujedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepkeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:h71NYCg-gkXKkfK2nfM1r7vhF7s0CL7hgel4Oyq3rQQgUaCBknJBRw> <xmx:h71NYC_TD969ZcmONmwMlgxHZDA3cOhdz6GhrF80UxtZUoEV7XSiKQ> <xmx:h71NYFvpEHLnaOZmkVIu-hIsQJwTwcqKAzElOBwvJt7Aiq-BRifVog> <xmx:h71NYGV1VkafbkSoLLj_7HqsEP9B5zvjUpt84RiX44zl72KhsACLKw>
Received: from fv-az207-156.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [23.101.145.171]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4FECD24005A for <asdf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:38:47 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============6205672936652721496=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: asdf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20210314073847.4FECD24005A@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:38:47 -0400
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asdf/BmNdylJEophI4P59ZOvzrfMhYRQ>
Subject: [Asdf] Weekly github digest (ASDF Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: asdf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A Semantic Description Format \(SDF\) for Things and their Interactions and Data" <asdf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asdf/>
List-Post: <mailto:asdf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:46:05 -0000



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* ietf-wg-asdf/SDF (+2/-3/💬4)
  2 issues created:
  - Rules for combining information from info blocks (by cabo)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/issues/26 
  - Mandatory/optional SDF information block (by akeranen)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/issues/23 

  3 issues received 4 new comments:
  - #26 Rules for combining information from info blocks (1 by cabo)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/issues/26 [1.next] 
  - #23 Mandatory/optional SDF information block (2 by WAvdBeek, akeranen)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/issues/23 [1.1] [has PR] 
  - #18 The example for sdfRequired should not point to a sdfData definition (1 by cabo)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/issues/18 

  3 issues closed:
  - Mandatory/optional SDF information block https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/issues/23 [1.1] [has PR] 
  - application/json URI scheme doesn't define a fragment construction https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/issues/20 [1.1] [has PR] 
  - The example for sdfRequired should not point to a sdfData definition https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/issues/18 



Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-asdf/SDF (+4/-3/💬3)
  4 pull requests submitted:
  - Mark scalemin/max as 1.next (by cabo)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pull/25 
  - Make information block optional in syntax, but point out it will be needed (by cabo)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pull/24 
  - Actually define scaleMinimum and scaleMaximum (by cabo)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pull/22 
  - Address I-D nits, close #20 (by cabo)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pull/21 

  2 pull requests received 3 new comments:
  - #24 Make information block optional in syntax, but point out it will be needed (2 by cabo, nwidell)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pull/24 
  - #22 Actually define scaleMinimum and scaleMaximum (1 by cabo)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pull/22 

  3 pull requests merged:
  - Mark scalemin/max as 1.0
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pull/25 
  - Make information block optional in syntax, but point out it will be needed
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pull/24 
  - Address I-D nits, close #20
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pull/21 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF