Re: [Asdf] Kicking off ASDF

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 07 August 2020 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB953A0C4D for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNKQCuUV7BgM for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5800C3A0C47 for <asdf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469FE389CD; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:46:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qSmRmB4aK4wM; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:46:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C12389CA; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:46:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A0D1D3; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:07:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, asdf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5C210025-34B4-45BC-9A1D-66D9E92B339A@tzi.org>
References: <5C210025-34B4-45BC-9A1D-66D9E92B339A@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 18:07:17 -0400
Message-ID: <31064.1596838037@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asdf/bK6n2mCxlUHVNlvroqFm6_-GXVw>
Subject: Re: [Asdf] Kicking off ASDF
X-BeenThere: asdf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A Semantic Description Format \(SDF\) for Things and their Interactions and Data" <asdf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asdf/>
List-Post: <mailto:asdf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 22:07:24 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    > https://github.com/one-data-model/SDF

    > One Data Model people have a number of feature requests that we should
    > have a look at now.  It would be good to have an SDF 1.1 by October
    > that addresses some of these requests, and to keep up an approximately
    > bi-monthly rhythm of releases (modulo holiday times).

1) What would you call a "release" here?

2) Are there important ODM member deadlines, meetings or processes that we
   should consider in our milestone process?

3) Would SDF be a single document, or a base document plus extensions?
   Are there parts that we can rapidly gain consensus on and publish, with
   discussion about the other parts?
   Or does draft-onedm-t2trg-sdf-00 represent the consensus part already, and
   there is some "freezer" of other things which were removed during the
   OneDM part of the effort?

    > Some github issues will now be opened by people who already have
    > experienced limitations of SDF 1.0 that should be addressed; of course,
    > other people can submit issues, too.  We can have a discussion right in
    > the github issues, or, for more fundamental decisions to be taken, also
    > here in the mailing list.  It will probably take a little until we have
    > pull requests based on these issues; we can discuss these then and, by
    > the time the discussion solidifies, we might have a WG.

    > I’m looking forward to SDF 1.1, and the further work of the ASDF WG-to-be!

Should publishing 1.0 ASAP be a goal, or should we just do 1.1?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-