IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-criteria is missing Outbound MTA definition.

Danny Angus <danny.angus@gmail.com> Tue, 30 June 2009 06:46 UTC

Return-Path: <danny.angus@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5B228C1F2 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.733
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.733 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R-XXLtRbqEnY for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B9628C144 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so30309bwz.7 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5tfrum0H+rdSbnbrd2ZCZY497qXF4Kg8z85k0WSgtKw=; b=LPkcc7ClGtHxiHMmjb3phs9auTcjZ+Lm63ghIPr4cVwBx2gzZLXCJuu4J0M4l0WxRK st2QpTPutLT4yZ7/ZHAiiFPdlEpUOJYiGYURMmfKGQmU0LbpokLVK3Ie9bQc2c0IRapi +6iazHA5MMr6QJNSY9fnbcba75LfqH6kJ3yoU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qm/BzUvzHPCvjju+ZEvaDX6+MvtcjBVba/4/qtENTF31IisajPCEdBlhOvSEGSOerp 7d2DvpmIjp5od1UkoXRhIAHZ1bGBDS2+/ekAWJEd1tbyUIJXvjXxKl+/4I2YeaClplAN IiJMCDbKE404AnNdPMi99Ca7wT/3PLgNmEW7o=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.126.145 with SMTP id c17mr4950629fas.102.1246344399662; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F0A7FB2C-B3B6-43B4-A45B-6800EE8091DE@mail-abuse.org>
References: <4A43B696.2000106@cybernothing.org> <94CA8D5B-3281-4884-8221-B3330F689EBF@mail-abuse.org> <7B7CEB6C086D94C295E661B1@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk> <32FAD477-3720-466B-8A02-464ED4004859@mail-abuse.org> <7E7339F784451F2FF12B6C2F@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk> <F0A7FB2C-B3B6-43B4-A45B-6800EE8091DE@mail-abuse.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:46:39 +0100
Message-ID: <5ec229170906292346o375faf34m273f6499029f333a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Danny Angus <danny.angus@gmail.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:46:23 -0700
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-criteria is missing Outbound MTA definition.
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:46:33 -0000

Ok, point taken about outbound MTA

I'm not sure what this is about..

> The draft should drop its current definition of Sender.  Spam does not just
> originate from purported RFC 5321 Senders, nor is it safe to assume that an
> MTA authorization referenced by an RFC 5321 Sender asserts where a message
> was initially created and entered.  Authorization does not provide this
> property.

> Stronger statements along the lines of scaling might be helpful.  It seems
> increasing potential DNS transactions by an order of magnitude or more has
> not been given adequate consideration in some anti-spam efforts. :^(

I think the statements about scaling are clear, do you not?

d.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email