Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
Dave Warren <lists@hireahit.com> Wed, 25 January 2012 19:23 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=137146ef3e=lists@hireahit.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8518121F853F for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:23:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.745,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MKVzJWQI0fY7 for
<asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vinny.hireahit.com (vinny.hireahit.com [72.51.42.137]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B1D21F853C for <asrg@irtf.org>;
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.24.0.104] by hireahit.com (vinny.hireahit.com)
(SecurityGateway 2.0.7) with SMTP id SG001550191.MSG for <asrg@irtf.org>;
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:23:26 -0800
Message-ID: <4F2056AC.9060401@hireahit.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:23:24 -0800
From: Dave Warren <lists@hireahit.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:10.0) Gecko/20120118 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <18B53BA2A483AD45962AAD1397BE13253846E0FE87@UK-EXCHMBX1.green.sophos>
<6.2.5.6.2.20120125102806.0ae6afe8@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120125102806.0ae6afe8@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SGOP-RefID: fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:23:36 -0000
On 1/25/2012 10:37 AM, SM wrote: > At 07:07 24-01-2012, Martijn Grooten wrote: >> (Vamsoft ORF is a spam-filter.) Basically uribl.com was returning >> 127.0.0.1 to _all_ queries from nameservers that are sending high >> volumes (presumably without paying for it) as some kind of >> punishment. http://uribl.com/ confirms that. > > "After investigating this further, it seems the affected ORF users > all use Google public DNS servers for the queries (or use such servers > as forwarders in their local DNS configuration)." > > Anyone using open recursive DNS servers or their ISP's DNS server for > DNSBL queries is asking for trouble. The listing is to get the > attention of the sender. It's "antisocial". I have to wonder, if a DNSBL were being operated entirely on a free basis (rather than a freemium model), might it not be better to take advantage of the large caches out there rather than having thousands of individual servers performing the same mundane set of lookups individually? Obviously this negates the DNSBL's ability to try and pull cash out of the larger entities, but purely from a resource management point of view, if someone wants to offer a front-line cache for free, surely that should reduce load. -- Dave Warren, CEO Hire A Hit Consulting Services http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren
- [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a p… Martijn Grooten
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… darxus
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John R. Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Derek Diget
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Paul Smith
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Brendan Hide
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis