Re: [Asrg] misconception in SPF

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Mon, 10 December 2012 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738FD21F8519 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:03:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.069, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUlEvT2kD4FG for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:03:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCE221F84F6 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:03:04 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,252,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="717694942"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2012 10:02:49 -0800
Received: from vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.77.34]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id qBAI2nVC015064 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.26]) by vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.34]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:02:49 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Asrg] misconception in SPF
Thread-Index: AQHN0+udaYECIbK7/UmgEWD3FGd7iJgMuwKAgAASgwCAALs5AIADkeEA///nIX2AAKlHgIAAmCoAgAAKlACAAEo9AIAAE1KAgAARtQCAACJcAA==
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:02:49 +0000
Message-ID: <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91866259E@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
References: <20121206212116.10328.qmail@joyce.lan> <50C1A95A.5000001@pscs.co.uk> <50C4A7F8.3010201@dcrocker.net> <CAFdugamTbTirVV2zXKOmc9oTaCS+QiTemhT=jvYJnHYscHQK7g@mail.gmail.com> <0D79787962F6AE4B84B2CC41FC957D0B20ACE6D0@ABN-EXCH1A.green.sophos> <20121209213307.D90C12429B@panix5.panix.com> <CAFduganBR_E-ui-3Xbic6F7qSmg1-Q+ideXLvb+1isLz8OF0Nw@mail.gmail.com> <0D79787962F6AE4B84B2CC41FC957D0B20ACFFE1@ABN-EXCH1A.green.sophos> <50C5A9A0.105@pscs.co.uk> <0D79787962F6AE4B84B2CC41FC957D0B20AD01B2@ABN-EXCH1A.green.sophos> <20121210145627.GA21217@gsp.org> <CAFdugakdqoN7S2YuWEVHo_YaOZJTPKt1w7tdcn8oasB=gb+qcg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFdugakdqoN7S2YuWEVHo_YaOZJTPKt1w7tdcn8oasB=gb+qcg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.118]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <0CF757DA7F5D82408F3CE13A528F6415@tahoe.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Asrg] misconception in SPF
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:03:05 -0000

On Dec 10, 2012, at 16:59, Christian Grunfeld <christian.grunfeld@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2) How many people on this list that use SPF have only one TXT record
> at the top domain and remain relaxed having [?~-]all, ignoring this
> thread ?

Tangential point, but maybe it's useful. All the raw data behind http://eggert.org/meter/spf is available. For example, the latest snapshot for SPF use by the IETF author community domain set is http://eggert.org/meter/data/2012-01-01@21:00-ietf-spf.txt

Lars