Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> Wed, 04 June 2003 12:29 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA14233 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:29:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h54CTHt10747 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:29:17 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h54CTHB10744 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:29:17 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA14228; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:29:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NXMS-0001Od-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 08:27:24 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NXMS-0001Oa-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 08:27:24 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h54CRDB10614; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:27:13 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h54CQCB10569 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:26:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA14116 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:26:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NXJT-0001Mm-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 08:24:19 -0400
Received: from 216-220-241-233.midmaine.com ([216.220.241.233] helo=nic-naa.net) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NXJT-0001Mj-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 08:24:19 -0400
Received: from nic-naa.net (localhost.nic-naa.net [127.0.0.1]) by nic-naa.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54CKRNr010657; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200306041220.h54CKRNr010657@nic-naa.net>
To: Dave Aronson <dja2003@hotpop.com>
cc: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>, asrg@ietf.org, brunner@nic-naa.net
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Jun 2003 07:50:22 EDT." <200306040750.22393.dja2003@hotpop.com>
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 08:20:27 -0400

Not to pick on anyone in particular, but an in-reply-to is useful ...

	acquisition of addresses (e.g., harvesting, sale)
	acquisition of delivery platforms (e.g., robo-hosts)
	acquisition of address blocks (e.g., /24 blocks)
	acquisition of journaling devices (1x1 gif references)
	...

None of these puts a byte in an inbox, yet.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg