IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button idea is pre-failed

Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> Thu, 04 March 2010 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <bzs@world.std.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B243A28C12A for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:36:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4a+G6opQGHMn for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:36:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls5.std.com [192.74.137.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8855228C0EA for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:36:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from world.std.com (root@world.std.com [192.74.137.5]) by TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o24IaFDl025257 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:36:17 -0500
Received: (from bzs@localhost) by world.std.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) id o24IaEYE009969; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:36:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <19343.64926.580332.14019@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:36:14 -0500
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B8FC0A6.3060903@nd.edu>
References: <20100302131810.GA22938@gsp.org> <4B8D3FD1.8090403@nortel.com> <BF533A28DBE487489EAB3411C5412CBE1032EE5B@BD01MSXMB015.US.Cingular.Net> <41D5397E-E5B8-4508-9393-E25CB307641F@thenose.net> <4B8FC0A6.3060903@nd.edu>
X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.2
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button idea is pre-failed
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:36:35 -0000

On March 4, 2010 at 09:16 prussell@nd.edu (Paul Russell) wrote:
 > On 3/4/2010 08:59, Dennis Dayman wrote:
 > > Interesting article
 > > 
 > > http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=123574
 > >
 > 
 > The author is not interested in reducing or eliminating spam; he simply wants
 > tools to validate his delusion that his spam is not spam.

I'll reiterate into the mawing abyss: If he's not paying me to deliver
it, it's spam. Thumbs down.

   -b

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email