Re: [Asrg] [ASRG] SMTP pull anyone?

Ravi shankar <ravisha22@gmail.com> Mon, 17 August 2009 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ravisha22@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0F328C2F1 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQEXNPNXMV66 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f194.google.com (mail-qy0-f194.google.com [209.85.221.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4817928C2EE for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so2247217qyk.15 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=jVIQN07ElYibT8OMyI+M8sfmnEfUUFlK0m7WoTVxIU0=; b=PQ9JmljC1keiqTnkMQfnkJSi1jGKTO9S2sfbvPrnsaD10Qc5aQV/YO3d0iId+iqHHd uaPT6NX4qPrmG15FDccRI3bi2zS+tBrfGY0qTeRo7+F9RiVneZ9ohvH1QzjP+++0YiYI rEAHhcFmWb/9QCLdK3Ul3H9BgC1X9I8eFbDLc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YeJ2YgqXmLjJDO1H4+szKGqD5OCwpu2VKCml+XhyhCCCpXBkaAfsiVAn9QWqKEduUb 4DiqDZwv5pDHNoBK9AKxh6HidQzSHt+Gbi5/MCKY0Q0QJfqQpBIbFyW7aUv2bhF65iiq t83WZDhNawTdeGT37gY0L5jagPNXfjfQyue7k=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.116.212 with SMTP id n20mr4616627qaq.172.1250536978278; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:52:58 +0530
Message-ID: <922a897b0908171222y30c07483x829e0f1491ab40f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ravi shankar <ravisha22@gmail.com>
To: asrg@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f9720085f06ab04715b5422
Subject: Re: [Asrg] [ASRG] SMTP pull anyone?
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:22:58 -0000

@John Levine,

The model is like a simple C/R involving Message ID of a mail. The sending
domain provides the Message ID and allows computational time for the
receiving domain and then query the sending domain to send the message.

Apparently i was not aware of the tumbleweed patent, in which case,
Tumbleweed, can claim this model if implemented as a infringement or
complete violation.

Regards,
Ravi