Re: [Asrg] What can we expect MUAs to do?

Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> Tue, 09 February 2010 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <steve@blighty.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580F43A6F89 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:36:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B9Hr68KyUO4P for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:36:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m.wordtothewise.com (fruitbat.wordtothewise.com [208.187.80.135]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B05A3A722C for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:36:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from platter.wordtothewise.com (184.wordtothewise.com [208.187.80.184]) by m.wordtothewise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425BD4F84ED for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:37:19 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
From: Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100209012858.225.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:37:18 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <5E354F92-6475-4DC2-A2C9-55488C62D1E1@blighty.com>
References: <20100209012858.225.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] What can we expect MUAs to do?
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:36:15 -0000

On Feb 8, 2010, at 5:28 PM, John Levine wrote:

>>>> * Create and render MIME.
>>>> (No, you don't get to call yourself an MUA if you can't do that today).
> 
> Are there still MUAs used by people other than retro-perverse geeks
> that don't render HTML?  Even Alpine does a credible lynx-like
> character rendering of HTML parts.
> 
> The reason I ask is that if a MUA knows about HTML, that makes it
> fairly likely it knows about HTTP, and if it knows about HTTP, that
> makes an HTTP transaction a plausible way to send the report.  (The
> obvious transaction is HTTP PUT, but I'm not sure how many firewalls
> and proxies properly support it.)  This avoids the routing through
> strangers problem.

I've seen a couple that don't handle HTML, at least not without some external
assistance. I'm also pretty sure there's one or two that handle in-band HTML,
but don't handle anything HTTP-ish. Not mainstream, but not one
guy and a dog either.

HTTP is worse than SMTP, though, as you'd either need to
implement yet another store-and-forward approach or disable the
TiS button unless there's a live internet connection.

Cheers,
  Steve