Re: [Asrg] DNS-based Email Sender Authentication Mechanisms: aCritical Review

"Chris Lewis" <clewis@nortel.com> Wed, 27 May 2009 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <CLEWIS@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005F83A6D64 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ST1yoXFWYf0G for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com (zcars04e.nortel.com [47.129.242.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054463A6CF6 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zcars04e.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n4RHI7S02755 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2009 17:18:07 GMT
Received: from zrtphx5h0.corp.nortel.com ([47.140.202.65]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 27 May 2009 13:19:13 -0400
Received: from [47.129.150.171] (47.129.150.171) by zrtphx5h0.corp.nortel.com (47.140.202.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.340.0; Wed, 27 May 2009 13:19:13 -0400
Message-ID: <4A1D760A.6070705@nortel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:19:06 -0400
From: Chris Lewis <clewis@nortel.com>
Organization: Nortel
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <003d01c9dd01$bf3531d0$800c6f0a@china.huawei.com> <4A1A45BA.5030704@swin.edu.au> <3be421270905250718y5d62f6d5odb6f2bebecf418d0@mail.gmail.com> <6684E747-55CB-4BB3-B838-9F4FE906AFE7@mail-abuse.org> <3be421270905251345l1bbe8ce9je5554b727e7440a7@mail.gmail.com> <4A1B0C0C.5010703@mines-paristech.fr> <4A1C6A79.7030609@nortel.com> <4A1D1455.90603@mines-paristech.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4A1D1455.90603@mines-paristech.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 May 2009 17:19:13.0706 (UTC) FILETIME=[41AB38A0:01C9DEEF]
Subject: Re: [Asrg] DNS-based Email Sender Authentication Mechanisms: aCritical Review
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:37:39 -0000

Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
> Chris Lewis wrote:
>> I experimented with it.  It works.  But doesn't add enough to be worth 
>> while if you already have decent MTA-end filtering.
>>
>> If you don't have decent MTA filtering, it might be worthwhile.

> OK, but... Well, you said "if you don't have decent MTA filtering".

I did.

> Looks like "hack", "workaround", ...

Yup.  No way I'd deploy it to our users.

> IMHO, one of the problems in spam filtering is that we're allways including and accepting 
> the existence of bad solutions, bad administered mail servers, bad practices, ...

I wouldn't "include or accept" it, or at most perhaps note that it's 
somewhat usable in idiosyncratic situations.  FSVO "somewhat" and "usable".

> It seems to me that ASRG should, first of all, encourage best practices.

Well yeah, but, you even have a hard time pushing MTA-end filtering as BCP.

Politics.  Sigh.