RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam
Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> Tue, 01 July 2003 19:32 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA13819 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19XQqu-0003n6-SC for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:31:44 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h61JVirw014566 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:31:44 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19XQqu-0003mr-Os for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:31:44 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA13800; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:31:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19XQqt-0007bG-00; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:31:43 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19XQqs-0007bD-00; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:31:42 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19XQqD-0003bc-Ua; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:31:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19XQq7-0003ZW-PW for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:30:55 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA13635 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:30:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19XQq4-0007ZQ-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:30:52 -0400
Received: from pcls1.std.com ([199.172.62.103] helo=TheWorld.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19XQq3-0007ZK-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:30:51 -0400
Received: from world.std.com (root@world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by TheWorld.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h61JUog3010350 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:30:50 -0400
Received: (from bzs@localhost) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA29453; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:30:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16129.57705.789432.104409@world.std.com>
To: "'asrg@ietf.org'" <asrg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030630221600.00b34f90@std5.imagineis.com>
References: <B1F08F445F370846AB7BEE424365F00D0188CA52@ctxchg.ciphertrus t.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20030630221600.00b34f90@std5.imagineis.com>
X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:30:49 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
At 03:35 PM 6/29/2003 -0400, Paul Judge wrote: > >Just as in any other business, the profit in spamming is equal to revenues > >minus costs. In spamming, revenue is equal to the number of spam messages > >received times the response rate times the profit per item. Expenses include I will point out that the hard evidence for this is lacking. I realize that people go nuts at the suggestion that the world is completely whack-o and not nice and neat as they presume. But in truth for all we know 99% of the spam is being produced by well-funded Al Qaeda operatives intent on disrupting the internet and has virtually no commercial value as described. It's not that much harder to believe than the sort of .00001% return arguments many seem comfortable with. Of course, this doesn't mean there isn't ONE or TEN spammers who operate as supposed, I just wonder if they're actually responsible for the problem. Before the howling begins let me point out that I have finally made some inroads here showing that the amplification via hijacked servers is probably much more important to the spam problem than, for example, a rational profit motive (i.e., without stolen resources there would probably be no possibility of profit.) I realize that's closely related and would tend to support a profit-motivativation of some sort but, as with organized crime, is it the profit motive (e.g., profits on stolen goods) or the crime (the low cost of stealing goods) which underlies the problem? More to the point I would assert that if we don't endeavor to nail down hard evidence and work forward from there we're in great danger of shadow-boxing with our own imaginings about how we would like to think spammers operate. I realize the urge to show progress is great and fact-gathering sounds like a frustrating impediment to some, but...how bad would it be if our efforts turned out to be foolish and disconnected from reality, research into a June bug*? * June Bug: Famous (among some) case of a psychosomatic, non-existant, insect seriously disrupting several textile factories down south. -- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202 | Login: 617-739-WRLD The World | Public Access Internet | Since 1989 *oo* _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Paul Judge
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Alan DeKok
- RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam C. Wegrzyn
- RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Paul Judge
- RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Bruce Stephens
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Dave Aronson
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Bruce Stephens
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Kee Hinckley
- 6. Solutions - Detection (was Re: [Asrg] Two ways… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Bruce Stephens
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Andrew Akehurst
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Walter Dnes
- Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam Bruce Stephens