Re: [Asrg] We don't need no stinkin IMAP or POP, was Adding a spam button to MUAs

der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG> Sat, 06 February 2010 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mouse@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A452B28C111 for <>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:22:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.522
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.310, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D9eklrp6ZXay for <>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:22:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3739B3A6E52 for <>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:22:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mouse@localhost) by Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA25605; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:23:01 -0500 (EST)
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Message-Id: <201002062323.SAA25605@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Erik-Conspiracy: There is no Conspiracy - and if there were I wouldn't be part of it anyway.
X-Message-Flag: Microsoft: the company who gave us the botnet zombies.
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:20:21 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] We don't need no stinkin IMAP or POP, was Adding a spam button to MUAs
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:22:07 -0000

>>> [...TXT...]
>> [...SRV...]
> I think that the dkim/spf experience is that anything beyond A and
> CNAME causes some dns providers out there to fail.

So what?  No matter what we do, it will cause some providers to fail.
Heck, some of them fail without our doing anything at all.

If anything, this would be a good thing, in that it may lead to such
bustification getting fixed, much the way DKIM/SPF have (in the
evolutionary sense) exerted pressure against unsupport for TXT.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B