IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article

Scott Nelson <scott@spamwolf.com> Mon, 05 May 2003 15:43 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA05949 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:43:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h45FpBZ11720 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:51:11 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h45FpB811717 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:51:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA05931; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:42:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Ci8y-0006cH-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 11:44:44 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Ci8y-0006cE-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 11:44:44 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h45Fl8811521; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:47:08 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h45Fk4811426 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:46:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA05759 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:37:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Ci3m-0006aO-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 11:39:22 -0400
Received: from adsl-66-120-64-133.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([66.120.64.133] helo=magic1.org) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Ci3g-0006aG-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 11:39:16 -0400
Message-Id: <aT5vaIe86J8qbrFA802@x>
To: Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>
From: Scott Nelson <scott@spamwolf.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
Cc: asrg@ietf.org
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 08:40:30 -0700

At 05:04 PM 5/5/03 +0200, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
>On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 04:11:01PM -0700, Scott Nelson wrote:
>
>> Draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt mentions that receiving servers
>> are free to drop email that doesn't have an RMX record.
>
>The mail shouldn't be dropped, it should be rejected in order
>to give the sending MTA a chance to generate an error message.
>

I could swear that I read "may be dropped" in the proposal, 
but now I can't find it.  My bad, sorry.

Scott Nelson <scott@spamwolf.com>


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email