Re: [Asrg] misconception in SPF

John Johnson <jjohnson@jdmc.org> Tue, 11 December 2012 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jjohnson@jdmc.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8117321F86D4 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:57:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GbwGEfHPaC2q for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from secure.jdmc.org (secure.jdmc.org [164.58.70.160]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDE121F8444 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:57:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [164.58.70.150] (mail.jdmc.org [164.58.70.150]) by secure.jdmc.org with ESMTP id qBBEv6DF028329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:57:06 -0600
X-Client-IP: 192.168.3.226
X-EnvRcpt: <asrg@irtf.org>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=jdmc.org; s=mail; t=1355237826; bh=OP7p1kc/pLwj4Imp4o2CC/Xlfet3KBdY6VgzS9YEg50=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SRZtxZV9/ey0x0yUnVX2eYiDBwgmQbtz1vyDzYCGXuUCQMXe6kS35aK+OfC7VczF6 kJxdRMQVb81ONNS8G/2HvP8Y4f67oYBLraYXeH4YKvVTt5b+wg20xi4eWl3wReYq2H XPQhYqWMgR2TL8VQSj1gbOY0ScRYUvCAwxhADAiI=
X-EnvFrom: jjohnson@jdmc.org
X-LDomain: mail.jdmc.org
X-LCount: 0
X-Vsender: dhcp3-226.jdmc.org [192.168.3.226]
Received: from [192.168.3.226] (dhcp3-226.jdmc.org [192.168.3.226]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.jdmc.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBBEv5Dh015452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:57:06 -0600
Message-ID: <50C749C1.3090100@jdmc.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:57:05 -0600
From: John Johnson <jjohnson@jdmc.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <1915198247.6651.1355114075018.JavaMail.root@peachymango.org>
In-Reply-To: <1915198247.6651.1355114075018.JavaMail.root@peachymango.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Apparently-To: <asrg@irtf.org>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 164.58.70.150
X-GlobalCerts-Milter: secure.jdmc.org 11Dec2012-08:57:06.653
Subject: Re: [Asrg] misconception in SPF
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:57:15 -0000

Franck Martin wrote:
> This issue is handled by DMARC, as it can work on all subdomains with only one TXT record.
> 
> If you try to do the same with SPF only, this may be complicated.
> 
> But then DMARC p=reject is not for all.

  +1, maybe +2

  I now get reports of hosts attempting to send using a subdomain that isn't in use.
  Franck, thanks for your article on DMARC, it truly is a good tool.

-john