Re: [Asrg] request for review for a non FUSSP proposal

Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org> Tue, 23 June 2009 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB033A6B54 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.193, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPCRpEVwrhXE for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harry.mail-abuse.org (harry.mail-abuse.org [168.61.5.27]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCFE3A6E02 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (gateway1.sjc.mail-abuse.org [168.61.5.81]) by harry.mail-abuse.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F5DA94439 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:09:11 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <5AB32FFA-A830-4BB6-BEFC-EBA58CC090E4@mail-abuse.org>
From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A3FFB64.6030409@telmon.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:09:11 -0700
References: <4A3DFC91.2090506@telmon.org> <4A3F9B2B.8020603@tana.it> <4A3FF3AF.9030401@telmon.org> <4A3FF7F1.1060705@nd.edu> <4A3FFB64.6030409@telmon.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] request for review for a non FUSSP proposal
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:09:07 -0000

Claudio,

An alternative for tokens would be to offer message links.  Rather  
than sending messages, a reference to a message is exchanged instead.   
The link format associated with the message should allow recipients a  
means to know who issued the message.  This would eliminate a need to  
track delivery status.  Unless the recipient follows the link, the  
message would not be considered delivered.  Receiving MTAs could offer  
a menu to allow recipients a means to automatically fetch messages  
from specific links as a method to save time when online, especially  
when dealing with slow uplinks.  This mode of operation might be  
globally used to ensure compatibility with existing MUAs or domains  
that don't support this mode of exchange.  Importantly, this method  
would not represent a major change in how email is currently handled,  
however authentication would become inherent with the transfer.

-Doug