Re: [Asrg] VPNs vs consent

Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz <Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr> Wed, 01 July 2009 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6947728C0F2 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dS1USrEm8QvW for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boipeva.ensmp.fr (cobra.ensmp.fr [194.214.158.101]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E8F3A6A66 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (joe.j-chkmail.org [88.168.143.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by boipeva.ensmp.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/JMMC-11/Feb/2009) with ESMTP id n61GUThu012922 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:30:29 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <4A4B8FA9.3080905@mines-paristech.fr>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:32:41 +0200
From: Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz <Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090507 Fedora/1.1.16-1.fc11 SeaMonkey/1.1.16
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Claudio Telmon <claudio@telmon.org>
References: <20090623213728.1825.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <4A41D773.50508@telmon.org> <4A41E506.2010106@mines-paristech.fr> <20090624160052.B5DC62428A@panix5.panix.com> <4A426B9D.7090901@mines-paristech.fr> <4A43618A.6000205@tana.it> <4A437393.3060105@mines-paristech.fr> <212.234.174.167.1726486840.1245941890@webmail.inet.it> <4A439639.9090106@mines-paristech.fr> <4A4A879D.80008@telmon.org> <4A4B76C8.3080602@mines-paristech.fr> <4A4B8D9F.9000000@telmon.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A4B8D9F.9000000@telmon.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Miltered: at boipeva with ID 4A4B8F25.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4A4B8F25.000/88.168.143.55/joe.j-chkmail.org/localhost.localdomain/<Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr>
Cc: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] VPNs vs consent
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr, Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:31:09 -0000

Claudio Telmon wrote:
> Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>> Claudio Telmon wrote:

> 
> Surely, but that's not what I mean. Once the address book manager knows
> that it must handle a list of (receiver) addresses aliases that will
> share the same tokens, it will push those tokens to the MTA, so that the
> MTA will have a valid list of tokens for the various aliases and reject
> messages as required.

This means defining some new protocol between the MTA and MUAs to push these tokens ???

Don't know exactly what/how you're intending with this, but the more complicated you 
imagine things, the less probable is it to be widely accepted.